Literature DB >> 16097868

Attention to locations and features: different top-down modulation of detector weights.

Stefano Baldassi1, Preeti Verghese.   

Abstract

It is well known that attention improves the visibility of a target. In this study, we examined the effect of attention on the selectivity profile for a target. We used a masking technique to measure the tuning function for detecting a target while cueing either its orientation or its location. In the presence of an orientation mask, uncued thresholds were maximally elevated with a parallel mask and decreased with increasing mask orientation from the target. The presence of a cue reduced the masking effect but the shape of the function was cue-specific: The orientation cue consistently improved thresholds at the target orientation, whereas the location cue typically improved thresholds at all orientations relative to the function measured in the absence of attention. The selective versus overall increase of sensitivity observed in our study may be due to differences in the weighting of individual detectors that determine the behavioral tuning function in the two cueing conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16097868     DOI: 10.1167/5.6.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  33 in total

1.  Attention improves encoding of task-relevant features in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Janneke F M Jehee; Devin K Brady; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Alex L White; Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Feature-based attention modulates orientation-selective responses in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Jonas Larsson; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Using a filtering task to measure the spatial extent of selective attention.

Authors:  John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Suppression effects in feature-based attention.

Authors:  Yixue Wang; James Miller; Taosheng Liu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  A review of the mechanisms by which attentional feedback shapes visual selectivity.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Janneke F M Jehee; Franco Pestilli
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.270

8.  Perceptual consequences of feature-based attentional enhancement and suppression.

Authors:  Tiffany C Ho; Scott Brown; Newton A Abuyo; Eun-Hae J Ku; John T Serences
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Suppression during binocular rivalry broadens orientation tuning.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-09-24

10.  Attention selects informative neural populations in human V1.

Authors:  Preeti Verghese; Yee-Joon Kim; Alex R Wade
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.