Literature DB >> 16097866

Ordinal configural cues combine with metric disparity in depth perception.

Johannes Burge1, Mary A Peterson, Stephen E Palmer.   

Abstract

Prior research on the combination of depth cues generally assumes that different cues must be in the same units for meaningful combination to occur. We investigated whether the geometrically ordinal cues of familiarity and convexity influence depth perception when unambiguous metric information is provided by binocular disparity. We used bipartite, random dot stereograms with a central luminance edge shaped like a face in profile. Disparity specified that the edge and dots on one side were closer than the dots on the other side. Configural cues suggested that the familiar, face-shaped region was closer than the unfamiliar side. Configural cues caused an increase in perceived depth for a given disparity signal when they were consistent with disparity and a decrease in perceived depth when they were inconsistent. Thus, geometrically ordinal configural cues can quantitatively influence a metric depth cue. Implications for the combination of configural and depth cues are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16097866     DOI: 10.1167/5.6.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  14 in total

1.  Natural-scene statistics predict how the figure-ground cue of convexity affects human depth perception.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Charless C Fowlkes; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Grounding the figure: surface attachment influences figure-ground organization.

Authors:  Shaun P Vecera; Stephen E Palmer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-08

3.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Ahna R Girshick; Kurt Akeley; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  Processing convexity and concavity along a 2-D contour: figure-ground, structural shape, and attention.

Authors:  Marco Bertamini; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

Review 5.  A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization.

Authors:  Johan Wagemans; James H Elder; Michael Kubovy; Stephen E Palmer; Mary A Peterson; Manish Singh; Rüdiger von der Heydt
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Depth variation and stereo processing tasks in natural scenes.

Authors:  Arvind V Iyer; Johannes Burge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  In visual search, guidance by surface type is different than classic guidance.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Ester Reijnen; Michael J Van Wert; Yoana Kuzmova
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Preserved local but disrupted contextual figure-ground influences in an individual with abnormal function of intermediate visual areas.

Authors:  Joseph L Brooks; Sharon Gilaie-Dotan; Geraint Rees; Shlomo Bentin; Jon Driver
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects.

Authors:  Erez Freud; Bat-Sheva Hadad; Galia Avidan; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-16

10.  Audiovisual Delay as a Novel Cue to Visual Distance.

Authors:  Philip Jaekl; Jakob Seidlitz; Laurence R Harris; Duje Tadin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.