Literature DB >> 16095512

The economic impact of MELD on liver transplant centers.

David A Axelrod1, Alan J Koffron, Talia Baker, Patrice Al-Saden, Irma Dixler, Gwen McNatt, Scott Sumner, Mike Vaci, Michael Abecassis.   

Abstract

Adoption of the model for end stage liver disease (MELD) system prioritized patients awaiting liver transplant (LT) by severity of illness including progressive renal dysfunction. Unfortunately, current reimbursement for LT is not adjusted by severity of illness or need for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (LKT). This study examines hospital cost and reimbursement for LT and LKT to determine the effect of MELD on transplant center (TC) financial outcomes given current reimbursement practices as well as DRG outlier threshold limits. LT was performed for 86 adults prior to and 127 following the implementation of MELD. Between the eras, there was a substantial increase in the average laboratory MELD score (17.1 to 20.7 p=0.004) and percentage of LKTs performed (5.8% to 17.3% p=0.01). Increasing MELD score was associated with higher costs ($4309 per MELD point p<0.001) and decreasing TC net income ($1512 per MELD point p<0.001). In patients not achieving the Medicare outlier status, predicted net loss was $17,700 for high-MELD patients and $19,133 for those needing LKT. In conclusion, contractual reimbursement agreements that are not indexed by severity of disease may not reflect the increased costs resulting from the MELD system. Even with outlier thresholds, Medicare reimbursement is inadequate resulting in a net loss for the TC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16095512     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01025.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  12 in total

1.  Societal reintegration following cadaveric orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  Ryan Kelly; Scott Hurton; Subhashini Ayloo; Mathew Cwinn; Sarah De Coutere-Bosse; Michele Molinari
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Geographic inequity in access to livers for transplantation.

Authors:  Heidi Yeh; Elizabeth Smoot; David A Schoenfeld; James F Markmann
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  The current economic burden of cirrhosis.

Authors:  Guy W Neff; Christopher W Duncan; Eugene R Schiff
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2011-10

4.  Rescue policy for discarded liver grafts: a single-centre experience of transplanting livers 'that nobody wants'.

Authors:  Lucas McCormack; Emilio Quiñonez; María Martha Ríos; Pablo Capitanich; Nicolás Goldaracena; Javier Kerman Cabo; Margarita Anders; Javier Osatnik; Pablo Comignani; Norberto Mezzadri; Ricardo Cesar Mastai
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  The interaction among donor characteristics, severity of liver disease, and the cost of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Paolo R Salvalaggio; Nino Dzebisashvili; Kara E MacLeod; Krista L Lentine; Adrian Gheorghian; Mark A Schnitzler; Samuel Hohmann; Dorry L Segev; Sommer E Gentry; David A Axelrod
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.799

6.  Case mix, quality and high-cost kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  M J Englesbe; J B Dimick; Z Fan; O Baser; J D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Healthcare utilization after liver transplantation is highly variable among both centers and recipients.

Authors:  T Bittermann; R A Hubbard; M Serper; J D Lewis; S F Hohmann; L B VanWagner; D S Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  The model for end-stage liver disease score is useful for predicting economic outcomes in adult cases of living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Takayuki Kogure; Yoshiyuki Ueno; Naoki Kawagishi; Noriatsu Kanno; Yoko Yamagiwa; Koji Fukushima; Susumu Satomi; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 6.772

9.  Patterns and Outcomes Associated with Patient Migration for Liver Transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Kristopher P Croome; David D Lee; Justin M Burns; Dana K Perry; Andrew P Keaveny; C Burcin Taner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A proposal to grade the severity of early allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Paolo Salvalaggio; Rogerio Carballo Afonso; Guilherme Felga; Ben-Hur Ferraz-Neto
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.