Literature DB >> 21384505

The interaction among donor characteristics, severity of liver disease, and the cost of liver transplantation.

Paolo R Salvalaggio1, Nino Dzebisashvili, Kara E MacLeod, Krista L Lentine, Adrian Gheorghian, Mark A Schnitzler, Samuel Hohmann, Dorry L Segev, Sommer E Gentry, David A Axelrod.   

Abstract

Accurate assessment of the impact of donor quality on liver transplant (LT) costs has been limited by the lack of a large, multicenter study of detailed clinical and economic data. A novel, retrospective database linking information from the University HealthSystem Consortium and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry was analyzed using multivariate regression to determine the relationship between donor quality (assessed through the Donor Risk Index [DRI]), recipient illness severity, and total inpatient costs (transplant and all readmissions) for 1 year following LT. Cost data were available for 9059 LT recipients. Increasing MELD score, higher DRI, simultaneous liver-kidney transplant, female sex, and prior liver transplant were associated with increasing cost of LT (P < 0.05). MELD and DRI interact to synergistically increase the cost of LT (P < 0.05). Donors in the highest DRI quartile added close to $12,000 to the cost of transplantation and nearly $22,000 to posttransplant costs in comparison to the lowest risk donors. Among the individual components of the DRI, donation after cardiac death (increased costs by $20,769 versus brain dead donors) had the greatest impact on transplant costs. Overall, 1-year costs were increased in older donors, minority donors, nationally shared organs, and those with cold ischemic times of 7-13 hours (P < 0.05 for all). In conclusion, donor quality, as measured by the DRI, is an independent predictor of LT costs in the perioperative and postoperative periods. Centers in highly competitive regions that perform transplantation on higher MELD patients with high DRI livers may be particularly affected by the synergistic impact of these factors.
Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21384505      PMCID: PMC4447593          DOI: 10.1002/lt.22230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  24 in total

1.  How can we define expanded criteria for liver donors?

Authors:  Robert M Merion; Nathan P Goodrich; Sandy Feng
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2006-07-31       Impact factor: 25.083

2.  The survival benefit of deceased donor liver transplantation as a function of candidate disease severity and donor quality.

Authors:  D E Schaubel; C S Sima; N P Goodrich; S Feng; R M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 3.  Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) for liver allocation: a 5-year score card.

Authors:  Richard B Freeman
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Impact of recipient MELD score on resource utilization.

Authors:  W K Washburn; B H Pollock; L Nichols; K V Speeg; G Halff
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  The increased costs of donation after cardiac death liver transplantation: caveat emptor.

Authors:  Colleen L Jay; Vadim Lyuksemburg; Raymond Kang; Luke Preczewski; Kevin Stroupe; Jane L Holl; Michael M Abecassis; Anton I Skaro
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Who pays for biliary complications following liver transplant? A business case for quality improvement.

Authors:  M J Englesbe; J Dimick; A Mathur; Y Ads; T H Welling; S J Pelletier; D G Heidt; J C Magee; R S Sung; J D Punch; D W Hanto; D A Campbell
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  The survival benefit of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Robert M Merion; Douglas E Schaubel; Dawn M Dykstra; Richard B Freeman; Friedrich K Port; Robert A Wolfe
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Incremental costs of post-liver transplantation complications.

Authors:  John B Ammori; Shawn J Pelletier; Raymond Lynch; Joshua Cohn; Yasser Ads; Darrell A Campbell; Michael J Englesbe
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Disparities in liver transplantation before and after introduction of the MELD score.

Authors:  Cynthia A Moylan; Carla W Brady; Jeffrey L Johnson; Alastair D Smith; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Andrew J Muir
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Liver transplantation cost in the model for end-stage liver disease era: looking beyond the transplant admission.

Authors:  Paula Buchanan; Nino Dzebisashvili; Krista L Lentine; David A Axelrod; Mark A Schnitzler; Paolo R Salvalaggio
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.799

View more
  29 in total

1.  Centre volume and resource consumption in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Christopher W Macomber; Joshua J Shaw; Heena Santry; Reza F Saidi; Nicolas Jabbour; Jennifer F Tseng; Adel Bozorgzadeh; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Comparative effectiveness of donation after cardiac death versus donation after brain death liver transplantation: Recognizing who can benefit.

Authors:  Colleen L Jay; Anton I Skaro; Daniela P Ladner; Edward Wang; Vadim Lyuksemburg; Yaojen Chang; Hongmei Xu; Sandhya Talakokkla; Neehar Parikh; Jane L Holl; Gordon B Hazen; Michael M Abecassis
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Prognostic impact of mechanical ventilation after liver transplantation: a national database study.

Authors:  Hui Yuan; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Vikram Chawa; Mark A Schnitzler; Huiling Xiao; David Axelrod; Nino Dzebisashvili; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  MELD as a metric for survival benefit of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Xun Luo; Joseph Leanza; Allan B Massie; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Christine E Haugen; Sommer E Gentry; Shane E Ottmann; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  The relative net health benefit of liver resection, ablation, and transplantation for early hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Gaya Spolverato; Alessandro Vitale; Aslam Ejaz; Yuhree Kim; Shishir K Maithel; David P Cosgrove; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Declining liver graft quality threatens the future of liver transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Eric S Orman; Maria E Mayorga; Stephanie B Wheeler; Rachel M Townsley; Hector H Toro-Diaz; Paul H Hayashi; A Sidney Barritt
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.799

7.  The economic impact of addressing the organ shortage with clinically high-risk allografts.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Mark A Schnitzler
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

Review 8.  Transplant for the very sick: No limitations in donor quality?

Authors:  Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  An examination of liver offers to candidates on the liver transplant wait-list.

Authors:  Jennifer Cindy Lai; Sandy Feng; John Paul Roberts
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Is liver transplantation safe and effective in elderly (≥70 years) recipients? A case-controlled analysis.

Authors:  Gregory C Wilson; R Cutler Quillin; Koffi Wima; Jeffrey M Sutton; Richard S Hoehn; Dennis J Hanseman; Ian M Paquette; Flavio Paterno; E Steve Woodle; Daniel E Abbott; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.