Literature DB >> 16095401

Strength and conditioning practices of Major League Baseball strength and conditioning coaches.

William P Ebben1, Marilyn J Hintz, Christopher J Simenz.   

Abstract

This study describes the results of a survey of the practices of Major League Baseball strength and conditioning (MLB S&C) coaches. The response rate was 70.0% (21 of 30). This survey examines (a) background information, (b) physical testing, (c) flexibility development, (d) speed development, (e) plyometrics, (f) strength/power development, (g) unique aspects, and (h) comments. Results indicate, in part, that coaches assess an average of 3.6 parameters of fitness, with body composition testing being the most commonly assessed parameter. All coaches use a variety of flexibility development strategies. All coaches use speed development strategies, with form running drills being the most common. Twenty of 21 (95.2%) coaches employ plyometric exercises with their athletes. Eighteen of 21 (85.7%) of MLB S&C coaches follow a periodization model (PM). Five of 21 coaches (23.8%) indicated that their athletes use Olympic-style lifts. The squat and its variations and the lunge and its variations were most frequently identified as the first and second most important exercises used to train the athletes. This survey provides detailed information about strength and conditioning practices at the most competitive level of baseball and serves as a review, as well as a source of applied information and new ideas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16095401     DOI: 10.1519/R-15464.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  30 in total

Review 1.  Power athletes and distance training: physiological and biomechanical rationale for change.

Authors:  Marcus C C W Elliott; Phillip P Wagner; Loren Chiu
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  The science of softball: implications for performance and injury prevention.

Authors:  Nicholas Flyger; Chris Button; Neetu Rishiraj
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Short Durations of Static Stretching when Combined with Dynamic Stretching do not Impair Repeated Sprints and Agility.

Authors:  Del P Wong; Anis Chaouachi; Patrick W C Lau; David G Behm
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 4.  Developing maximal neuromuscular power: part 2 - training considerations for improving maximal power production.

Authors:  Prue Cormie; Michael R McGuigan; Robert U Newton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performance.

Authors:  David G Behm; Anis Chaouachi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Weightlifting pulling derivatives: rationale for implementation and application.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Paul Comfort; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Offseason Workout Recommendations for Baseball Players.

Authors:  Brooks Klein; Daniel Cobian; Goldy Simmons; Michael Reinold
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-02-26

Review 8.  Neurophysiological Mechanisms Underpinning Stretch-Induced Force Loss.

Authors:  Gabriel S Trajano; Kazunori Nosaka; Anthony J Blazevich
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  The effects of different durations of static stretching within a comprehensive warm-up on voluntary and evoked contractile properties.

Authors:  Jonathan C Reid; Rebecca Greene; James D Young; Daniel D Hodgson; Anthony J Blazevich; David G Behm
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 10.  Influence of running velocity on vertical, leg and joint stiffness : modelling and recommendations for future research.

Authors:  Matt Brughelli; John Cronin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.