Literature DB >> 16094274

Analysis of stress distribution in lumbar interbody fusion.

Naresh Kumar1, Meakin R Judith, Aravind Kumar, Viren Mishra, Mulholland C Robert.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A 2-dimensional axisymmetric finite element model of an intervertebral segment was used to investigate the stress patterns in the adjacent vertebrae of fused spinal segment incorporating 4 common cage designs. The same was used to study the effect of maturation of bone graft on stress distribution pattern.
OBJECTIVES: To study and compare the stress distribution patterns in a normal spinal segment and in the adjacent vertebrae of a fused spinal segment. The effect of bone graft incorporation around the mesh cage was also investigated. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar fusion surgery is thought to relieve discogenic low back pain by eliminating the abnormal intersegmental movement at the level of disc degeneration. Successful spinal fusion does not guarantee symptomatic pain relief. Discogenic pain is also known to be associated with an abnormal load transmission pattern across the degenerate disc. We hypothesized that the lumbar interbody fusion results in relief of discogenic pain by normalizing the load distribution pattern.
METHODS: We used a 2-dimensional axisymmetric finite element model of an intervertebral segment to investigate the stress patterns in the vertebrae adjacent to a fused spinal segment incorporating 4 common cage designs: (1) anterior lumbar interbody fusion, (2) posterior lumbar interbody fusion rectangular, (3) posterior lumbar interbody fusion threaded, and (4) mesh cage.
RESULTS: High stress concentrations and abnormal overall stress patterns were noted for all the cage designs studied. The anterior lumbar interbody fusion cage with its larger contact area showed the least abnormal stress magnitude in comparison with the other cages. Incorporation of bone in and around the mesh cage increased the area of contact and decreased the abnormal high stresses. The spine fusion model representing final bony healing showed restoration of near physiologic stress pattern.
CONCLUSIONS: Interbody fusion cages with larger area of contact between cage and vertebral endplate produces a lower stress distribution pattern. A successful bony fusion restores near physiologic stress distribution pattern. Restoration of near normal load distribution pattern may become an important aim of surgery for discogenic low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16094274     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000172160.78207.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

Review 1.  Scientific basis for the treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  R C Mulholland
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Differences in the interbody bone graft area and fusion rate between minimally invasive and traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective short-term image analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Yao; Hsi-Hsien Lin; Po-Hsin Chou; Shih-Tien Wang; Ming-Chau Chang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Evolution of Design of Interbody Cages for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.071

4.  How does lumbar degenerative disc disease affect the disc deformation at the cephalic levels in vivo?

Authors:  Shaobai Wang; Qun Xia; Peter Passias; Weishi Li; Kirkham Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Harms titanium mesh cage fracture.

Authors:  Zdenek Klezl; Carlos A Bagley; Markus J Bookland; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Zdenek Rezek; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  In vivo loads in the lumbar L3-4 disc during a weight lifting extension.

Authors:  Shaobai Wang; Won Man Park; Yoon Hyuk Kim; Thomas Cha; Kirkham Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 7.  The myth of lumbar instability: the importance of abnormal loading as a cause of low back pain.

Authors:  R C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Anterior lumbar interbody implants: importance of the interdevice distance.

Authors:  Brian R Subach; Anne G Copay; Marcus M Martin; Thomas C Schuler
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2011-03-10

9.  Early results of thoraco lumbar burst fracture treatment using selective corpectomy and rectangular cage reconstruction.

Authors:  Bowei Liang; Guofeng Huang; Luobing Ding; Liangqi Kang; Mo Sha; Zhenqi Ding
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Interlaminar stabilization offers greater biomechanical advantage compared to interspinous stabilization after lumbar decompression: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Teng Lu; Yi Lu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.