Literature DB >> 16092742

Staphylococcus aureus colonization and the risk of infection in critically ill patients.

Adam Keene1, Peter Vavagiakis, Mei-Ho Lee, Kathryn Finnerty, Deborah Nicolls, Christian Cespedes, Bianca Quagliarello, Mary Ann Chiasson, David Chong, Franklin D Lowy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between Staphylococcus aureus nasal and tracheal colonization and infection in medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients. The primary outcome was the incidence of S. aureus infection in colonized versus non-colonized patients.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. Patients admitted to the MICU during the study period were screened for S. aureus nasal and tracheal colonization by culture and a PCR assay twice weekly. Demographic, clinical, and microbiologic data were collected in the MICU and for 30 days after discharge. PFGE and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed on all S. aureus nasal, tracheal, and clinical isolates.
RESULTS: Twenty-three percent of patients (47 of 208) were nasally colonized with S. aureus. Twenty-four percent of these patients developed S. aureus infections versus 2% of non-colonized patients (P < .01). Nine of 11 patients with both nasal colonization and infection were infected by their colonizing strain. Two of 47 nasally colonized patients developed an infection with a different strain of S. aureus. Fifty-three percent of intubated patients with nasal colonization (10 of 19) had tracheal colonization with S. aureus as opposed to 4.9% of intubated, non-colonized patients (3 of 61) (P < .01). Parenteral antibiotics were ineffective at clearing nasal colonization. PCR detected S. aureus colonization (nasal and tracheal) within 6.5 hours with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 99%.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of S. aureus infection was significantly elevated in nasally colonized MICU patients. Techniques to rapidly detect colonization in this population may make targeted topical prevention strategies feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16092742     DOI: 10.1086/502591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  13 in total

1.  Concurrent analysis of nose and groin swab specimens by the IDI-MRSA PCR assay is comparable to analysis by individual-specimen PCR and routine culture assays for detection of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Emma J Bishop; Elizabeth A Grabsch; Susan A Ballard; Barrie Mayall; Shirley Xie; Rhea Martin; M Lindsay Grayson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) detection: comparison of two molecular methods (IDI-MRSA PCR assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR assay) with three selective MRSA agars (MRSA ID, MRSASelect, and CHROMagar MRSA) for use with infection-control swabs.

Authors:  S J van Hal; D Stark; B Lockwood; D Marriott; J Harkness
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Predictive value of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal swab PCR assay for MRSA pneumonia.

Authors:  Benjamin Dangerfield; Andrew Chung; Brandon Webb; Maria Teresa Seville
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Concordance of PCR and culture from nasal swabs for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a setting of concurrent antistaphylococcal antibiotics.

Authors:  Erica S Shenoy; Farzad Noubary; Jiyeon Kim; Eric S Rosenberg; Jessica A Cotter; Hang Lee; Rochelle P Walensky; David C Hooper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization using sponges.

Authors:  Chang-Seop Lee; Bianca Montalmont; Jessica A O'Hara; Alveena Syed; Charma Chaussard; Traci L McGaha; Diana L Pakstis; Ju-Hyung Lee; Kathleen A Shutt; Yohei Doi
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Routine pre-cesarean Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Bruce Y Lee; Ann E Wiringa; Elizabeth A Mitgang; Sarah M McGlone; Abena N Afriyie; Yeohan Song; Richard H Beigi
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization and subsequent infection in intensive care unit patients: does methicillin resistance matter?

Authors:  Hitoshi Honda; Melissa J Krauss; Craig M Coopersmith; Marin H Kollef; Amy M Richmond; Victoria J Fraser; David K Warren
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  A trial of discontinuation of empiric vancomycin therapy in patients with suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus health care-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  John M Boyce; Olivia-Fabiola Pop; Odaliz Abreu-Lanfranco; Whitney Y Hung; Ann Fisher; Afshin Karjoo; Benjamin Thompson; Zenon Protopapas
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  MRSA detection: comparison of two molecular methods (BD GeneOhm PCR assay and Easy-Plex) with two selective MRSA agars (MRSA-ID and Oxoid MRSA) for nasal swabs.

Authors:  S J van Hal; Z Jennings; D Stark; D Marriott; J Harkness
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Staphylococcus aureus in the community: colonization versus infection.

Authors:  Maureen Miller; Heather A Cook; E Yoko Furuya; Meera Bhat; Mei-Ho Lee; Peter Vavagiakis; Paul Visintainer; Glenny Vasquez; Elaine Larson; Franklin D Lowy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.