Literature DB >> 16091322

Delayed diagnosis of cervical cancer in young women.

C K Yu1, C Chiu, M McCormack, A Olaitan.   

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether women under 35 years presenting with cervical cancer experience delays between presentation and diagnosis. All women referred with cervical cancer to the gynaecological cancer centre for the North London Cancer Network from January 2002 to December 2004 were identified retrospectively. Clinical presentation and time interval from symptoms to diagnosis were compared between women under and women over 35 years. A total of 105 women were included. Median age at diagnosis was 45 years (range 23--88). Twenty-two women (19%) were under 35 years at presentation and 17 had persistent symptoms prior to diagnosis. Median time from initial presentation to diagnosis in this group was 9 months (range 3--24 months); significantly longer than in the older group (9 vs 2 months; p=0.0009). Although cervical cancer is relatively rare in young women, diagnosis should be considered in symptomatic women as delay can limit treatment options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16091322     DOI: 10.1080/01443610500118814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  10 in total

1.  Young adults' experiences with cancer: comments from patients and survivors.

Authors:  Baukje Bo Miedema; Julie Easley; Ryan Hamilton
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Timeliness of cervical cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Vicki B Benard; William Howe; Janet Royalty; William Helsel; William Kammerer; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Prevalence and determinants of late-stage presentation among cervical cancer patients, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tiwabwork Tekalign; Mister Teshome
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Delays in diagnosis of young females with symptomatic cervical cancer in England: an interview-based study.

Authors:  Anita W Lim; Amanda J Ramirez; William Hamilton; Peter Sasieni; Julietta Patnick; Lindsay Jl Forbes
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  The use, quality and effectiveness of pelvic examination in primary care for the detection of gynaecological cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pauline Williams; Peter Murchie; Maggie E Cruickshank; Christine M Bond; Christopher D Burton
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.267

6.  The Diagnostic Value of Circulating Cell-Free HPV DNA in Plasma from Cervical Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Sara Bønløkke; Magnus Stougaard; Boe Sandahl Sorensen; Berit Bargum Booth; Estrid Høgdall; Gitte-Bettina Nyvang; Jacob Christian Lindegaard; Jan Blaakær; Jesper Bertelsen; Katrine Fuglsang; Mikael Lenz Strube; Suzan Lenz; Torben Steiniche
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 7.666

7.  Measuring the nature and duration of symptoms of cervical cancer in young women: developing an interview-based approach.

Authors:  Anita W W Lim; Lindsay J L Forbes; Adam N Rosenthal; Kantipati S Raju; Amanda-Jane Ramirez
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Estimates of delays in diagnosis of cervical cancer in Nepal.

Authors:  Deepak Gyenwali; Gita Khanal; Rajan Paudel; Archana Amatya; Jitendra Pariyar; Sharad Raj Onta
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Patient and disease characteristics associated with late tumour stage at presentation of cervical cancer in northwestern Tanzania.

Authors:  Ramadhani Mlange; Dismas Matovelo; Peter Rambau; Benson Kidenya
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Patient and primary care delays in the diagnostic pathway of gynaecological cancers: a systematic review of influencing factors.

Authors:  Pauline Williams; Peter Murchie; Christine Bond
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 5.386

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.