Baukje Bo Miedema1, Julie Easley, Ryan Hamilton. 1. Dalhousie University Family Medicine Teaching Unit, Dr Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital, Fredericton, NB, Canada. bo.miedema@rvh.nb.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the experiences with cancer of adults diagnosed when between 20 and 35 years old. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews. SETTING: Largest health care region in the province of New Brunswick. PARTICIPANTS: Six men and 9 women cancer patients and survivors. METHOD: Fifteen adults interviewed when between the ages of 20 and 43 representing a variety of cancers and stages of disease were recruited for this study. Interviews were guided by a set of open-ended questions and explored participants' experiences with cancer from initial presentation of symptoms through to survivorship issues. MAIN FINDINGS: The most important clinical issue that emerged from the analysis was that participants' youth appeared to contribute to delays in diagnosis of cancer. These delays were attributed to either patients' or physicians' inaction. Some patients attributed their initial cancer symptoms to the adverse effects of alcohol or excessive partying; others feared a bad diagnosis and delayed seeking help. Family physicians frequently interpreted nonspecific symptoms as resulting from patients' lifestyle choices and were reluctant to consider a diagnosis of cancer. Several family physicians reportedly believed that persistent symptoms could not be the result of cancer because patients were too young. CONCLUSION: Although cancer is relatively rare in young adults, family physicians need to include it in differential diagnoses. Both patients and physicians tend to minimize cancer symptoms in young adults. Delays in diagnosis might not affect health outcomes, but can cause distress to young adults with cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the experiences with cancer of adults diagnosed when between 20 and 35 years old. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews. SETTING: Largest health care region in the province of New Brunswick. PARTICIPANTS: Six men and 9 womencancerpatients and survivors. METHOD: Fifteen adults interviewed when between the ages of 20 and 43 representing a variety of cancers and stages of disease were recruited for this study. Interviews were guided by a set of open-ended questions and explored participants' experiences with cancer from initial presentation of symptoms through to survivorship issues. MAIN FINDINGS: The most important clinical issue that emerged from the analysis was that participants' youth appeared to contribute to delays in diagnosis of cancer. These delays were attributed to either patients' or physicians' inaction. Some patients attributed their initial cancer symptoms to the adverse effects of alcohol or excessive partying; others feared a bad diagnosis and delayed seeking help. Family physicians frequently interpreted nonspecific symptoms as resulting from patients' lifestyle choices and were reluctant to consider a diagnosis of cancer. Several family physicians reportedly believed that persistent symptoms could not be the result of cancer because patients were too young. CONCLUSION: Although cancer is relatively rare in young adults, family physicians need to include it in differential diagnoses. Both patients and physicians tend to minimize cancer symptoms in young adults. Delays in diagnosis might not affect health outcomes, but can cause distress to young adults with cancer.
Authors: M Montella; A Crispo; G D'Aiuto; M De Marco; G de Bellis; G Fabbrocini; M Pizzorusso; M Tamburini; P Silvestra Journal: Eur J Cancer Prev Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Barbara Turner; Ronald E Myers; Terry Hyslop; Walter W Hauck; David Weinberg; Timothy Brigham; James Grana; Todd Rothermel; Neil Schlackman Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Fred Tudiver; Remi Guibert; Jeannie Haggerty; Antonio Ciampi; Wendy Medved; Judith Belle Brown; Carol Herbert; Alan Katz; Paul Ritvo; Bill Grant; Vivek Goel; Philip Smith; Maeve O'Beirne; J Ivan Williams; Peter Moliner Journal: J Fam Pract Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 0.493
Authors: Alex W K Wong; Ting-Ting Chang; Katrina Christopher; Stephen C L Lau; Lynda K Beaupin; Brad Love; Kim L Lipsey; Michael Feuerstein Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Adam L Green; Murali Chintagumpala; Mark Krailo; Bryan Langholz; Daniel Albert; Ralph Eagle; Myles Cockburn; Patricia Chevez-Barrios; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ruth I Hart; David A Cameron; Fiona J Cowie; Jeni Harden; Nicholas B Heaney; David Rankin; Angela B Jesudason; Julia Lawton Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 2.655