Literature DB >> 24526520

A content-boosted collaborative filtering algorithm for personalized training in interpretation of radiological imaging.

Hongli Lin1, Xuedong Yang, Weisheng Wang.   

Abstract

Devising a method that can select cases based on the performance levels of trainees and the characteristics of cases is essential for developing a personalized training program in radiology education. In this paper, we propose a novel hybrid prediction algorithm called content-boosted collaborative filtering (CBCF) to predict the difficulty level of each case for each trainee. The CBCF utilizes a content-based filtering (CBF) method to enhance existing trainee-case ratings data and then provides final predictions through a collaborative filtering (CF) algorithm. The CBCF algorithm incorporates the advantages of both CBF and CF, while not inheriting the disadvantages of either. The CBCF method is compared with the pure CBF and pure CF approaches using three datasets. The experimental data are then evaluated in terms of the MAE metric. Our experimental results show that the CBCF outperforms the pure CBF and CF methods by 13.33 and 12.17 %, respectively, in terms of prediction precision. This also suggests that the CBCF can be used in the development of personalized training systems in radiology education.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24526520      PMCID: PMC4090405          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-014-9678-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  9 in total

1.  Individualized computer-aided education in mammography based on user modeling: concept and preliminary experiments.

Authors:  Maciej A Mazurowski; Jay A Baker; Huiman X Barnhart; Georgia D Tourassi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Improvement in mammography interpretation skills in a community radiology practice after dedicated teaching courses: 2-year medical audit of 38,633 cases.

Authors:  M N Linver; S B Paster; R D Rosenberg; C R Key; C A Stidley; W V King
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  A review of research into the development of radiologic expertise: implications for computer-based training.

Authors:  Paul M Taylor
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography in a community practice: are there differences between specialists and general radiologists?

Authors:  Jessica W T Leung; Frederick R Margolin; Katherine E Dee; Richard P Jacobs; Susan R Denny; John D Schrumpf
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Interobserver variability in the CT assessment of honeycombing in the lungs.

Authors:  Takeyuki Watadani; Fumikazu Sakai; Takeshi Johkoh; Satoshi Noma; Masanori Akira; Kiminori Fujimoto; Alexander A Bankier; Kyung Soo Lee; Nestor L Müller; Jae-Woo Song; Jai-Soung Park; David A Lynch; David M Hansell; Martine Remy-Jardin; Tomás Franquet; Yukihiko Sugiyama
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications.

Authors:  Y Jiang; R M Nishikawa; R A Schmidt; A Y Toledano; K Doi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) and Image Database Resource Initiative (IDRI): a completed reference database of lung nodules on CT scans.

Authors:  Samuel G Armato; Geoffrey McLennan; Luc Bidaut; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Charles R Meyer; Anthony P Reeves; Binsheng Zhao; Denise R Aberle; Claudia I Henschke; Eric A Hoffman; Ella A Kazerooni; Heber MacMahon; Edwin J R Van Beeke; David Yankelevitz; Alberto M Biancardi; Peyton H Bland; Matthew S Brown; Roger M Engelmann; Gary E Laderach; Daniel Max; Richard C Pais; David P Y Qing; Rachael Y Roberts; Amanda R Smith; Adam Starkey; Poonam Batrah; Philip Caligiuri; Ali Farooqi; Gregory W Gladish; C Matilda Jude; Reginald F Munden; Iva Petkovska; Leslie E Quint; Lawrence H Schwartz; Baskaran Sundaram; Lori E Dodd; Charles Fenimore; David Gur; Nicholas Petrick; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Brian Hughes; Alessi Vande Casteele; Sangeeta Gupte; Maha Sallamm; Michael D Heath; Michael H Kuhn; Ekta Dharaiya; Richard Burns; David S Fryd; Marcos Salganicoff; Vikram Anand; Uri Shreter; Stephen Vastagh; Barbara Y Croft
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms.

Authors:  J G Elmore; C K Wells; C H Lee; D H Howard; A R Feinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.

Authors:  K Kerlikowske; D Grady; J Barclay; S D Frankel; S H Ominsky; E A Sickles; V Ernster
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-12-02       Impact factor: 13.506

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.