Literature DB >> 16082268

Genetic algorithms for adaptive psychophysical procedures: recipient-directed design of speech-processor MAPs.

Gregory H Wakefield1, Chris van den Honert, Wendy Parkinson, Sean Lineaweaver.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of the research is to evaluate the application of genetic algorithms (GAs) in listener-directed optimization of audio-processing designs. We hypothesize that cochlear-implant recipients can use a GA-guided adaptive psychophysical search procedure to select useful designs from among a large number of speech processor MAPS.
DESIGN: An adaptive psychophysical procedure was developed in which a listener's preferred four out of eight speech processor MAPs were updated according to a genetic algorithm. Experiments involving cochlear-implant recipients were conducted to characterize both the convergence behavior of the adaptive procedure as well as properties of the MAPs optimized by the recipient.
RESULTS: Results from five cochlear-implant recipients indicate that the adaptive procedure converges to useful speech processor MAPs within twenty iterations.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest a means whereby a potentially large number of audio-processing designs can be searched efficiently by a human listener without requiring excessive amounts of feedback or prior knowledge about the listener's preferences. In the case of cochlear-implant recipients, it may be possible to use this procedure as an aid to the clinician in the fitting of a speech processor MAP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16082268     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200508001-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  7 in total

1.  Initial development of a temporal-envelope-preserving nonlinear hearing aid prescription using a genetic algorithm.

Authors:  Andrew T Sabin; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-06

Review 2.  The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system.

Authors:  James F Patrick; Peter A Busby; Peter J Gibson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

3.  Feasibility of real-time selection of frequency tables in an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Elad Sagi; Tasnim A Morbiwala; Chin-Tuan Tan; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Thomas M Talavage; Shivank Sinha; Heidi Neuburger; Mahan Azadpour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Valid Acoustic Models of Cochlear Implants: One Size Does Not Fit All.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Nicole Hope Capach; Jonathan D Neukam; Mahan Azadpour; Elad Sagi; Ariel Edward Hight; E Katelyn Glassman; Annette Lavender; Keena P Seward; Margaret K Miller; Nai Ding; Chin-Tuan Tan; Matthew B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 6.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05

7.  EEG-based diagnostics of the auditory system using cochlear implant electrodes as sensors.

Authors:  Ben Somers; Christopher J Long; Tom Francart
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.