Literature DB >> 16079908

Secular trends in cesarean delivery rates among macrosomic deliveries in the United States, 1989 to 2002.

Sheree L Boulet1, Greg R Alexander, Hamisu M Salihu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We describe national trends in cesarean delivery rates among macrosomic infants during 1989 to 2000 and evaluate the maternal characteristics and risk factors for macrosomic infants delivered by cesarean section as compared to macrosomic infants delivered vaginally. STUDY
DESIGN: We analyzed US 1989 to 2000 Natality files, selecting term (37 to 44 week) single live births to U.S. resident mothers. We compare macrosomic infants (4000 to 4499, 4500 to 4999 and 5000+ g infants) to a normosomic (3000 to 3999 g) control group.
RESULTS: The proportion of cesarean deliveries among 5000+ g infants increased significantly over the time period. The adjusted odds ratio of cesarean delivery increased for all macrosomic categories over the 12-year period, as compared to normal birth weight infants.
CONCLUSIONS: Rates of cesarean delivery among macrosomic infants continue to increase despite a lack of evidence of the benefits of cesarean delivery within this population. Further exploration of the rationale for this trend is warranted and should include the development of an optimal delivery strategy for such patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16079908     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  11 in total

1.  The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Samuel Parry; Aaron B Caughey; Sarah Rosen; Allison Keen; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Shoulder dystocia: prediction and management.

Authors:  Meghan G Hill; Wayne R Cohen
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-22

3.  Pre-pregnant body mass index, weight gain and the risk of delivering large babies among non-diabetic mothers.

Authors:  C Kabali; M M Werler
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 3.561

4.  Interpregnancy weight change and adverse maternal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chelsea Lynes; Alexander C McLain; Edwina H Yeung; Paul Albert; Jihong Liu; Nansi S Boghossian
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Length and weight of newborns in Croatia from 1985 to 2009.

Authors:  Hrvojka Soljacic Vranes; Ivka Djakovic
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  The rise and fall of excess male infant mortality.

Authors:  Greg L Drevenstedt; Eileen M Crimmins; Sarinnapha Vasunilashorn; Caleb E Finch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Labor and Delivery Experiences of Mothers with Suspected Large Babies.

Authors:  Erika R Cheng; Eugene R Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Naomi E Stotland; Ronald E Iverson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-12

8.  ATLANTIC DIP: closing the loop: a change in clinical practice can improve outcomes for women with pregestational diabetes.

Authors:  Lisa A Owens; Gloria Avalos; Breda Kirwan; Louise Carmody; Fidelma Dunne
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Maternal obesity and occurrence of fetal macrosomia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura Gaudet; Zachary M Ferraro; Shi Wu Wen; Mark Walker
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Possible relation between maternal consumption of added sugar and sugar-sweetened beverages and birth weight--time trends in a population.

Authors:  Jacob Holter Grundt; Jakob Nakling; Geir Egil Eide; Trond Markestad
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.