Literature DB >> 22826448

ATLANTIC DIP: closing the loop: a change in clinical practice can improve outcomes for women with pregestational diabetes.

Lisa A Owens1, Gloria Avalos, Breda Kirwan, Louise Carmody, Fidelma Dunne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prospective evaluation of pregnancy outcomes in women with pregestational diabetes over 6 years. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The ATLANTIC Diabetes in Pregnancy group provides care for women with diabetes throughout pregnancy. In 2007, the group identified that women were poorly prepared for pregnancy and outcomes were suboptimal. A change in practice occurred, offering women specialist-led, hub-and-spoke evidence-based care. We now compare outcomes from 2005 to 2007 with those from 2008 to 2010.
RESULTS: There was an increase in the numbers attending preconception care (28-52%, P = 0.01). Glycemic control before and throughout pregnancy improved. There was an overall increase in live births (74-92%, P < 0.001) and decrease in perinatal mortality rate (6.2-0.65%, P < 0.001). There was a decrease in large-for-gestational-age babies in mothers with type 1 diabetes mellitus (30-26%, P = 0.02). Elective caesarean section rates increased, while emergency section rates decreased.
CONCLUSIONS: Changing the process of clinical care delivery can improve outcomes in women with pregestational diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22826448      PMCID: PMC3402274          DOI: 10.2337/dc12-0120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


Pregnancy can pose significant risk to women with type 1 (T1DM) or type 2 (T2DM) diabetes mellitus (1). Optimal care has been shown to decrease these risks. The ATLANTIC Diabetes in Pregnancy (ATLANTIC DIP) group established in 2005 represents five antenatal centers in a wide geographical location along the Irish Atlantic seaboard, covering a population of 500,000. The group provides coordinated care for women with diabetes before, during, and after pregnancy. This report outlines pregnancy outcomes in women with pregestational diabetes, following changes to the process of clinical care delivery.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a prospective follow-up study designed to assess outcome after postaudit change in the process of clinical care delivery. The change resulted in the provision of dedicated combined antenatal/diabetes clinics and prepregnancy care (PPC) clinics delivered by specialist diabetes and obstetric staff. Clinical care delivery was supported by a diabetes electronic management system (DIAMOND), locally developed clinical care guidelines based on National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines (2), and professional and patient education materials. Pregnancy outcomes were compared before (2005–2007) and after (2008–2010) implementation of these changes. PPC involved education, contraceptive advice, provision of folic acid (5 mg) for 12 weeks, discussion of glycemic targets, initiation and/or intensification of insulin, prevention and treatment of hypoglycemia, discontinuation of teratogenic drugs, and management of blood pressure and diabetes-related complications. All women with diabetes for >6 months before the index pregnancy were included. Five values of HbA1C were chosen to represent metabolic control; those recorded at the first obstetric visit; 12, 24, and 36 weeks’ gestation; and before delivery. Large for gestational age (LGA) was defined as birth weight >90th centile, and small for gestational age was defined as birth weight <10th centile. All congenital malformations, major and minor, were included. Preeclampsia was defined as blood pressure >140/90 mmHg with proteinuria after 20 weeks’ gestation. Maternal BMI (measured as kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) was assessed at the first obstetrical visit. Target HbA1C was <7%/53 mmol.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-two pregnancies were examined over a 6-year period; 61% had T1DM, and 39% had T2DM. There was an increase in the numbers of pregnancies in women with T2DM over time, in line with the increasing incidence in the background population (Table 1).
Table 1

Pregnancy outcomes comparing period 1 (2005–2007) with period 2 (2008–2010) for ATLANTIC DIP

Pregnancy outcomes comparing period 1 (2005–2007) with period 2 (2008–2010) for ATLANTIC DIP Between periods 1 and 2, the number of women receiving prepregnancy care increased by twofold (P = 0.01) (Table 1). There was a nonsignificant increase in the number receiving folic acid prepregnancy (P = 0.2). Overall, the first recorded HbA1C decreased from a mean of 7.3 to 6.9% (P < 0.001), and the number of women achieving HbA1C <7% at their booking visit increased significantly (P = 0.038). Glycemic control improved significantly throughout pregnancy for women with both T1DM and T2DM (Table 1). There was a significant improvement in pregnancy outcomes. The live birth rate increased from 74 to 92% (P < 0.0001), and miscarriages and stillbirths decreased between the study periods (Table 1). Overall, perinatal mortality fell from 5 (6.2%) to 1 (0.65%). Congenital malformations were unchanged; however, there were no malformations recorded in women attending PPC. Preeclampsia rates were unchanged (11.5%). There was a significant decrease in number of babies born LGA in women with T1DM (P = 0.02). Conversely, however, there was a significant increase in babies born LGA in women with T2DM (P = 0.02). There was no change in numbers born small for gestational age. Caesarean section rates increased overall, with an increase in elective rates from and a nonsignificant reduction in emergency section rate (Table 1). In addition, there was a nonsignificant reduction in the number of babies admitted to neonatal intensive care. Mean booking BMI was unchanged (mean 26 kg/m2) in women with T1DM. In comparison, mean BMI of women with T2DM increased from 30 to 34 kg/m2 between the two time intervals (P = 0.034). More women with T2DM were obese (BMI >30 kg/m2) in time period 2 compared with time period 1 (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Pregestational diabetes occurs in approximately 1 in 250 pregnancies, and prevalence is increasing (3) worldwide. Pregnancies in women with pregestational diabetes are associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, as has been demonstrated by studies including the Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH) diabetes report (3) and by this study group (1). Maternal complications include higher rates of caesarean delivery (3), worsening of preexisting retinopathy (5) and nephropathy (6), and higher rates of hypertension and preeclampsia (3). Fetal/neonatal complications include higher perinatal mortality rates (2), more LGA babies associated with shoulder dystocia and caesarean delivery (7), and more congenital malformations (2,8) and premature delivery (9). PPC (10) including optimization of glycemic control is associated with an improvement in these outcomes. Early pregnancy glycemic control, more so than late, decreases the risk of delivering a macrosomic infant (11). Glycemic control also decreases the risk of miscarriage and malformation (12). Animal studies have shown that folic acid use decreases the incidence of fetal malformation (13). ATLANTIC DIP aims to provide coordinated, specialist-delivered, evidence-based care to women before, during, and after pregnancy. In 2007, outcomes were compared with that of the background population and were found to be suboptimal, with stillbirth 5 times, perinatal mortality 3.5 times, and congenital anomalies twice that of the background population (1). These results are similar to those reported by previous population-based studies (3,14). In addition, women were poorly prepared for pregnancy, with only 28% of women attending PPC, 43% taking folic acid prior to pregnancy, and one-half entering pregnancy with an HbA1C <7% (1). These results are similar to those reported by previous population-based studies (3,14). There have been few similar studies, but previous intensive pregnancy care programs have been shown to be similarly effective (15). Following these results, ATLANTIC DIP concentrated on changing the process of clinical care delivery and developed combined antenatal/diabetes clinics and dedicated PPC clinics, electronic data collection, clinical care guidelines, and professional and patient education materials, aiming to “close the audit loop.” We have now subsequently compared outcomes and found that more women are attending PPC, with better glycemic control resulting in a decrease in miscarriage and stillbirth rates and an increase in take-home-baby rate. There have been few similar studies, but intensive pregnancy care programs have been shown to be similarly effective (15). T2DM in pregnancy is becoming more common, and these women are becoming more obese and delivering more macrosomic babies. Further work is required for optimization of this cohort of women.
  13 in total

Review 1.  The effect of pregnancy on the natural history of diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy.

Authors:  J Star; M W Carpenter
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.430

2.  The late preterm birth rate and its association with comorbidities in a population-based study.

Authors:  Margaret F Carter; Sharon Fowler; Alan Holden; Elly Xenakis; Donald Dudley
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Spontaneous abortions and major malformations in women with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  M F Greene
Journal:  Semin Reprod Endocrinol       Date:  1999

4.  Outcomes in type 1 diabetic pregnancies: a nationwide, population-based study.

Authors:  Dorte M Jensen; Peter Damm; Lars Moelsted-Pedersen; Per Ovesen; Jes G Westergaard; Margrethe Moeller; Henning Beck-Nielsen
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Secular trends in cesarean delivery rates among macrosomic deliveries in the United States, 1989 to 2002.

Authors:  Sheree L Boulet; Greg R Alexander; Hamisu M Salihu
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  Risk of minor and major fetal malformations in diabetics with high haemoglobin A1c values in early pregnancy.

Authors:  K Ylinen; P Aula; U H Stenman; T Kesäniemi-Kuokkanen; K Teramo
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-08-11

7.  ATLANTIC DIP: pregnancy outcome for women with pregestational diabetes along the Irish Atlantic seaboard.

Authors:  Fidelma P Dunne; Gloria Avalos; Meave Durkan; Yvonne Mitchell; Therese Gallacher; Marita Keenan; Marie Hogan; Louise A Carmody; Geraldine Gaffney
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 17.152

8.  Diabetic nephropathy: pregnancy performance and fetomaternal outcome.

Authors:  E A Reece; D R Coustan; J P Hayslett; T Holford; J Coulehan; T Z O'Connor; J C Hobbins
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Effectiveness of a regional prepregnancy care program in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: benefits beyond glycemic control.

Authors:  Helen R Murphy; Jonathan M Roland; Timothy C Skinner; David Simmons; Eleanor Gurnell; Nicholas J Morrish; Shiu-Ching Soo; Suzannah Kelly; Boon Lim; Joanne Randall; Sarah Thompsett; Rosemary C Temple
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in type 1 diabetic pregnancies: A large, population-based study.

Authors:  Martina Persson; Mikael Norman; Ulf Hanson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Birth defects in pregestational diabetes: Defect range, glycemic threshold and pathogenesis.

Authors:  Rinat Gabbay-Benziv; E Albert Reece; Fang Wang; Peixin Yang
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2015-04-15

2.  Obesity alters phosphoramide mustard-induced ovarian DNA repair in mice.

Authors:  Shanthi Ganesan; Jackson Nteeba; Jill A Madden; Aileen F Keating
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.285

3.  Pre-pregnancy care and pregnancy outcomes in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a comparison of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injection therapy.

Authors:  K J Neff; R Forde; C Gavin; M M Byrne; R G R Firth; S Daly; F M McAuliffe; M Foley; M Coffey; S Coulter-Smith; B T Kinsley
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Diabetic retinopathy in pregnancy: a population-based study of women with pregestational diabetes.

Authors:  Aoife M Egan; Lyle McVicker; Adrienne Heerey; Louise Carmody; Fiona Harney; Fidelma P Dunne
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.011

Review 5.  Insulin pump for type 2 diabetes: use and misuse of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Yves Reznik; Ohad Cohen
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Comparing type 1 and type 2 diabetes in pregnancy- similar conditions or is a separate approach required?

Authors:  Lisa A Owens; Jon Sedar; Louise Carmody; Fidelma Dunne
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Risk of macrosomia remains glucose-dependent in a cohort of women with pregestational type 1 diabetes and good glycemic control.

Authors:  Katarzyna Cyganek; Jan Skupien; Barbara Katra; Alicja Hebda-Szydlo; Izabela Janas; Iwona Trznadel-Morawska; Przemysław Witek; Elżbieta Kozek; Maciej T Malecki
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.633

8.  Do patients with gestational diabetes mellitus and their own blood glucose meter have better pregnancy outcomes than those not using a glucose meter?

Authors:  Wei Dong; Yan Li; Jun-Jie Sun; Li-Hong Chen; Jia Guo; Ling Dong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Implementation of Preconception Care for Women With Diabetes.

Authors:  Irma Yehuda
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2016-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.