Literature DB >> 27856288

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Cx43-Mimetic Peptide in Cutaneous Scarring.

Christina L Grek1, Jade Montgomery2, Meenakshi Sharma3, A Ravi4, J S Rajkumar5, Kurtis E Moyer6, Robert G Gourdie7, Gautam S Ghatnekar8.   

Abstract

The transmembrane protein Cx43 has key roles in fibrogenic processes including inflammatory signaling and extracellular matrix composition. aCT1 is a Cx43 mimetic peptide that in preclinical studies accelerated wound closure, decreased inflammation and granulation tissue area, and normalized mechanical properties after cutaneous injury. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of aCT1 in the reduction of scar formation in human incisional wounds. In a prospective, multicenter, within-participant controlled trial, patients with bilateral incisional wounds (≥10 mm) after laparoscopic surgery were randomized to receive acute treatment (immediately after wounding and 24 hours later) with an aCT1 gel formulation plus conventional standard of care protocols, involving moisture-retentive occlusive dressing, or standard of care alone. The primary efficacy endpoint was average scarring score using visual analog scales evaluating incision appearance and healing progress over 9 months. There was no significant difference in scar appearance between aCT1- or control-treated incisions after 1 month. At month 9, aCT1-treated incisions showed a 47% improvement in scar scores over controls (Vancouver Scar Scale; P = 0.0045), a significantly higher Global Assessment Scale score (P = 0.0009), and improvements in scar pigmentation, thickness, surface roughness, and mechanical suppleness. Adverse events were similar in both groups. aCT1 has potential to improve scarring outcome after surgery.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27856288      PMCID: PMC5728084          DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invest Dermatol        ISSN: 0022-202X            Impact factor:   8.551


  57 in total

Review 1.  International clinical recommendations on scar management.

Authors:  Thomas A Mustoe; Rodney D Cooter; Michael H Gold; F D Richard Hobbs; Albert-Adrien Ramelet; Peter G Shakespeare; Maurizio Stella; Luc Téot; Fiona M Wood; Ulrich E Ziegler
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Scar-improving efficacy of avotermin administered into the wound margins of skin incisions as evaluated by a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II clinical trial.

Authors:  James Bush; Jonathan A L Duncan; Jeremy S Bond; Piyush Durani; Karen So; Tracey Mason; Sharon O'Kane; Mark W J Ferguson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Standardized assessment of breast cancer surgical scars integrating the Vancouver Scar Scale, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, and patients' perspectives.

Authors:  Pauline T Truong; Freddy Abnousi; Celina M Yong; Allen Hayashi; James A Runkel; Theressa Phillips; Ivo A Olivotto
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Estimated need for surgery worldwide based on prevalence of diseases: a modelling strategy for the WHO Global Health Estimate.

Authors:  John Rose; Thomas G Weiser; Phil Hider; Leona Wilson; Russell L Gruen; Stephen W Bickler
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 26.763

Review 5.  Internet-based survey on current practice for evaluation, prevention, and treatment of scars, hypertrophic scars, and keloids.

Authors:  David B Lumenta; Eva Siepmann; Lars-Peter Kamolz
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 6.  Pulsed dye laser treatment, a review of indications and outcome based on published trials.

Authors:  J M Smit; C G Bauland; D S Wijnberg; P H M Spauwen
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2005-10

7.  Inhibition of connexin 43 hemichannel-mediated ATP release attenuates early inflammation during the foreign body response.

Authors:  Bennett W Calder; Joshua Matthew Rhett; Heather Bainbridge; Stephen A Fann; Robert G Gourdie; Michael J Yost
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation.

Authors:  Lieneke J Draaijers; Fenike R H Tempelman; Yvonne A M Botman; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Esther Middelkoop; Robert W Kreis; Paul P M van Zuijlen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 9.  Updated scar management practical guidelines: non-invasive and invasive measures.

Authors:  Stan Monstrey; Esther Middelkoop; Jan Jeroen Vranckx; Franco Bassetto; Ulrich E Ziegler; Sylvie Meaume; Luc Téot
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 10.  Analysis of frequency of use of different scar assessment scales based on the scar condition and treatment method.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Bae; Yong Chan Bae
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-03-12
View more
  20 in total

1.  Connexin 43 regulates the expression of wound healing-related genes in human gingival and skin fibroblasts.

Authors:  Rana Tarzemany; Guoqiao Jiang; Jean X Jiang; Corrie Gallant-Behm; Colin Wiebe; David A Hart; Hannu Larjava; Lari Häkkinen
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 2.  Therapeutic strategies targeting connexins.

Authors:  Dale W Laird; Paul D Lampe
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Cutaneous Radiation Injuries: Models, Assessment and Treatments.

Authors:  Andrea L DiCarlo; Aaron C Bandremer; Brynn A Hollingsworth; Suhail Kasim; Adebayo Laniyonu; Nushin F Todd; Sue-Jane Wang; Ellen R Wertheimer; Carmen I Rios
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 4.  Connexins: Synthesis, Post-Translational Modifications, and Trafficking in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Trond Aasen; Scott Johnstone; Laia Vidal-Brime; K Sabrina Lynn; Michael Koval
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Connexin 43-Based Therapeutics for Dermal Wound Healing.

Authors:  Jade Montgomery; Gautam S Ghatnekar; Christina L Grek; Kurtis E Moyer; Robert G Gourdie
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Review: Multimodal bioactive material approaches for wound healing.

Authors:  Serena Mandla; Locke Davenport Huyer; Milica Radisic
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2018-06-26

7.  Effects of Alpha-Connexin Carboxyl-Terminal Peptide (aCT1) and Bowman-Birk Protease Inhibitor (BBI) on Canine Oral Mucosal Melanoma (OMM) Cells.

Authors:  Ayami Sato; Ivone Izabel Mackowiak da Fonseca; Márcia Kazumi Nagamine; Gabriela Fernandes de Toledo; Rennan Olio; Francisco Javier Hernandez-Blazquez; Tomohiro Yano; Elizabeth Shinmay Yeh; Maria Lucia Zaidan Dagli
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-10

8.  The connexin 43 carboxyl terminal mimetic peptide αCT1 prompts differentiation of a collagen scar matrix in humans resembling unwounded skin.

Authors:  Jade Montgomery; William J Richardson; Spencer Marsh; J Matthew Rhett; Francis Bustos; Katherine Degen; Gautam S Ghatnekar; Christina L Grek; L Jane Jourdan; Jeffrey W Holmes; Robert G Gourdie
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.834

Review 9.  Pharmaceutical Prophylaxis of Scarring with Emphasis on Burns: A Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Peter D'Arpa; Kai P Leung
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.947

Review 10.  Redox for Repair: Cold Physical Plasmas and Nrf2 Signaling Promoting Wound Healing.

Authors:  Anke Schmidt; Sander Bekeschus
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.