Literature DB >> 8560657

Same day surgery for radical retropubic prostatectomy: is it an attainable goal?

J S Palmer1, E M Worwag, W G Conrad, B F Blitz, G W Chodak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Economic forces are stimulating a re-evaluation of various management strategies. Recent critical pathways for radical prostatectomy have resulted in reduced length of stay to as low as 2.9 days.
METHODS: The time in the operating room and recovery room, average blood loss, length of hospitalization, patient charges, and estimated hospital costs were compared for 20 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy up to 1 year before and for 27 men after initiation of a critical pathway. Under the protocol, patients receive an education booklet and preoperative teaching in preparation for early discharge and an epidural for anesthesia. An anonymous questionnaire was mailed to all patients treated by the pathway after catheter removal.
RESULTS: The new pathway resulted in a significant reduction in average time in the operating room (3.7 +/- 0.4 hours versus 4.9 +/- 1.2 hours), estimated blood loss (1204 +/- 527 cc versus 1948 +/- 740 cc), and length of hospitalization (1.7 +/- 0.6 days versus 4.6 +/- 1.5 days). In addition, patient charges and hospital costs were reduced by 32% and 35%, respectively. Thirty-seven percent of the study group was discharged after 1 night compared with 0% in the group treated before the pathway was initiated. Forty-one percent of the study group was not transfused and did not donate blood. Outcome surveys completed by 25 of 27 study patients revealed an overall satisfaction of 96% with 0 of 10 patients who were discharged after one night indicating they would have preferred to be hospitalized longer.
CONCLUSIONS: Conventional management of men undergoing radical prostatectomy can be safely modified while preserving patient satisfaction without increasing morbidity. Avoiding peripheral narcotics and emphasizing preoperative teaching has enabled us to reduce length of stay greatly, with same day discharge now an attainable goal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8560657     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80376-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  [Clinical pathway "laparoscopic prostatectomy". Analysis of anesthesiological procedures in a randomized study].

Authors:  J-P Braun; M Walter; M Lein; J Roigas; B Schwilk; M Moshirzadeh; K Eveslage; B Rehberg-Klug; D Hansen; C Spies
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  The economic costs of early stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Enhanced recovery pathway for radical prostatectomy: Implementation and evaluation in a universal healthcare system.

Authors:  Hiba Abou-Haidar; Samuel Abourbih; David Braganza; Talal Al Qaoud; Lawrence Lee; Franco Carli; Deborah Watson; Armen G Aprikian; Simon Tanguay; Liane S Feldman; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Prostate cancer treatment in black and white men: the need to consider both stage at diagnosis and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  A P Polednak
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Predictive factors for prolonged hospital stay after retropubic radical prostatectomy in a high-volume teaching center.

Authors:  Rafael F Coelho; Mauricio D Cordeiro; Guilherme P Padovani; Rafael Localli; Limirio Fonseca; José Pontes; Giuliano B Guglielmetti; Miguel Srougi; William Carlos Nahas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.