Literature DB >> 16075238

The morphology and biomechanical characteristics of subcutaneously implanted tissue-engineered human septal cartilage.

Andreas Haisch1, Georg N Duda, Daniel Schroeder, Andreas Gröger, Christopher Gebert, Korinna Leder, Michael Sittinger.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine the morphology and biomechanical characteristics of in vivo cultured tissue-engineered human septal cartilage as a prospective autogenous transplant material for subcutaneous implantation in reconstructive procedures. Chondrocytes were enzymatically isolated from human septal cartilage biopsies. The cell number was expanded in monolayer culture. Chondrocytes were then fixed on a non-woven poly-lactide-poly-glycolide (PGLA) polymer scaffold by means of fibrin glue. The PGLA-polymer construct was implanted subcutaneously on the back of athymic mice and allowed to mature for 6 or 12 weeks. After killing the mice, the formed cartilage was tested on a material testing machine with a highly standardized reproducible setting. Biomechanical testing consisted of an indentation test, which revealed the failure load and compressive modulus of the neocartilage. The failure load shows the upper limit of supported stress. The compressive modulus is a measure of the templates' stiffness. After testing, the templates were histologically stained. Native human septal cartilage served as a control group. Histological and macroscopic examination showed cartilage formation of a hyaline-like morphology. Histological staining revealed the synthesis of abundant mucopolysaccharid matrix. The biomechanical characteristics of neocartilage proved to be of no statistical difference compared to native human septal cartilage. The failure load and compressive modulus were initially somewhat lower and reached the control group's results after 12 weeks in-vivo. Summarizing, tissue engineered nasal cartilage matches typical mechanical characteristics of native hyaline cartilage. Its elasticity and failure load are of sufficient quality to meet the clinical requirements for reconstructive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16075238     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-005-0935-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  17 in total

1.  Synthetic polymers seeded with chondrocytes provide a template for new cartilage formation.

Authors:  C A Vacanti; R Langer; B Schloo; J P Vacanti
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Tissue engineering of cartilage in space.

Authors:  L E Freed; R Langer; I Martin; N R Pellis; G Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  [Proliferative potential of nasal septum chondrocytes for in vitro culture of cartilage transplants].

Authors:  M Sittinger; J Bräunling; E Kastenbauer; C Hammer; G Burmester; J Bujía
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.057

Review 4.  Tissue engineering.

Authors:  R Langer; J P Vacanti
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments.

Authors:  V C Mow; S C Kuei; W M Lai; C G Armstrong
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  [Tissue engineering of human cartilage tissue for reconstructive surgery using biocompatible resorbable fibrin gel and polymer carriers].

Authors:  A Haisch; O Schultz; C Perka; V Jahnke; G R Burmester; M Sittinger
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Engineering of cartilage tissue using bioresorbable polymer carriers in perfusion culture.

Authors:  M Sittinger; J Bujia; W W Minuth; C Hammer; G R Burmester
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Mechanical properties of septal cartilage homografts.

Authors:  M J Glasgold; Y P Kato; D Christiansen; J A Hauge; A I Glasgold; F H Silver
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Development of biomechanical properties and morphogenesis of in vitro tissue engineered cartilage.

Authors:  P X Ma; B Schloo; D Mooney; R Langer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1995-12

10.  Age-related changes in the composition and mechanical properties of human nasal cartilage.

Authors:  Nicole Rotter; Geoffrey Tobias; Martin Lebl; Amit K Roy; Maynard C Hansen; Charles A Vacanti; Lawrence J Bonassar
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 4.013

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of human nasal cartilage nonlinear and rate dependent mechanical properties.

Authors:  Brian Chang; Chelsea Reighard; Colleen Flanagan; Scott Hollister; David Zopf
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  In vivo implantation of tissue-engineered human nasal septal neocartilage constructs: a pilot study.

Authors:  Angela A Chang; Marsha S Reuther; Kristen K Briggs; Barbara L Schumacher; Gregory M Williams; Maripat Corr; Robert L Sah; Deborah Watson
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of human and porcine auricular cartilage.

Authors:  David A Zopf; Colleen L Flanagan; Hassan B Nasser; Anna G Mitsak; Farhan S Huq; Vishnu Rajendran; Glenn E Green; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Model to Estimate Threshold Mechanical Stability of Lower Lateral Cartilage.

Authors:  James Hakjune Kim; Ashley Hamamoto; Nicole Kiyohara; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.611

5.  Model for estimating the threshold mechanical stability of structural cartilage grafts used in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Allison Zemek; Rohit Garg; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Precultivation of engineered human nasal cartilage enhances the mechanical properties relevant for use in facial reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Jian Farhadi; Ilario Fulco; Sylvie Miot; Dieter Wirz; Martin Haug; Sally C Dickinson; Anthony P Hollander; A U Daniels; Gerhard Pierer; Michael Heberer; Ivan Martin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  In vivo evaluation of a regenerative approach to nasal dorsum augmentation with a polycaprolactone-based implant.

Authors:  Paul S Wiggenhauser; Elizabeth R Balmayor; Nicole Rotter; Jan T Schantz
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.175

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.