Literature DB >> 25891012

Biomechanical evaluation of human and porcine auricular cartilage.

David A Zopf1, Colleen L Flanagan2, Hassan B Nasser1, Anna G Mitsak2, Farhan S Huq1, Vishnu Rajendran2, Glenn E Green1, Scott J Hollister2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The mechanical properties of normal auricular cartilage provide a benchmark against which to characterize changes in auricular structure/function due to genetic defects creating phenotypic abnormalities in collagen subtypes. Such properties also provide inputs/targets for auricular reconstruction scaffold design. Several studies report the biomechanical properties for septal, costal, and articular cartilage. However, analogous data for auricular cartilage are lacking. Therefore, our aim in this study was to characterize both whole-ear and auricular cartilage mechanics by mechanically testing specimens and fitting the results to nonlinear constitutive models. STUDY
DESIGN: Mechanical testing of whole ears and auricular cartilage punch biopsies.
METHODS: Whole human cadaveric ear and auricular cartilage punch biopsies from both porcine and human cartilage were subjected to whole-ear helix-down compression and quasistatic unconfined compression tests. Common hyperelastic constitutive laws (widely used to characterize soft tissue mechanics) were evaluated for their ability to represent the stress-strain behavior of auricular cartilage.
RESULTS: Load displacement curves for whole ear testing exhibited compliant linear behavior until after significant displacement where nonlinear stiffening occurred. All five commonly used two-term hyperelastic soft tissue constitutive models successfully fit both human and porcine nonlinear elastic behavior (mean R(2) fit >0.95).
CONCLUSIONS: Auricular cartilage exhibits nonlinear strain-stiffening elastic behavior that is similar to other soft tissues in the body. The whole ear exhibits compliant behavior with strain stiffening at high displacement. The constants from the hyperelastic model fits provide quantitative baselines for both human and porcine (a commonly used animal model for auricular tissue engineering) auricular mechanics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA
© 2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auricular cartilage; auricular tissue engineering; biomechanics; cartilage computational modeling; nonlinear elasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25891012      PMCID: PMC4512857          DOI: 10.1002/lary.25040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  30 in total

1.  Autogenous grafts are worth the extra time.

Authors:  D M Toriumi
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-04

2.  Grafts in rhinoplasty: alloplastic vs. autogenous.

Authors:  J Parker Porter
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-04

3.  Microtia reconstruction using a porous polyethylene framework.

Authors:  T Romo; M S Fozo; A P Sclafani
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.446

4.  Mutations in COL11A2 cause non-syndromic hearing loss (DFNA13).

Authors:  W T McGuirt; S D Prasad; A J Griffith; H P Kunst; G E Green; K B Shpargel; C Runge; C Huybrechts; R F Mueller; E Lynch; M C King; H G Brunner; C W Cremers; M Takanosu; S W Li; M Arita; R Mayne; D J Prockop; G Van Camp; R J Smith
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 5.  Quantitative evaluation of mechanical properties in tissue-engineered auricular cartilage.

Authors:  Luc Nimeskern; Gerjo J V M van Osch; Ralph Müller; Kathryn S Stok
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 6.389

6.  Immunochemical and mechanical characterization of cartilage subtypes in rabbit.

Authors:  Andreas Naumann; James E Dennis; Amad Awadallah; David A Carrino; Joseph M Mansour; Ernst Kastenbauer; Arnold I Caplan
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  Tissue engineering of autologous cartilage for craniofacial reconstruction by injection molding.

Authors:  Sophia C N Chang; Geoffrey Tobias; Amit K Roy; Charles A Vacanti; Lawrence J Bonassar
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  A missense mutation in the mouse Col2a1 gene causes spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia congenita, hearing loss, and retinoschisis.

Authors:  Leah Rae Donahue; Bo Chang; Subburaman Mohan; Nao Miyakoshi; Jon E Wergedal; David J Baylink; Norman L Hawes; Clifford J Rosen; Patricia Ward-Bailey; Qing Y Zheng; Roderick T Bronson; Kenneth R Johnson; Muriel T Davisson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  In vitro tissue engineering to generate a human-sized auricle and nasal tip.

Authors:  Syed H Kamil; Koji Kojima; Martin P Vacanti; Lawrence J Bonassar; Charles A Vacanti; Roland D Eavey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Tissue engineering auricular reconstruction: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Shyh-Jou Shieh; Shinichi Terada; Joseph P Vacanti
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of human nasal cartilage nonlinear and rate dependent mechanical properties.

Authors:  Brian Chang; Chelsea Reighard; Colleen Flanagan; Scott Hollister; David Zopf
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Auricular reconstruction from rib to 3D printing.

Authors:  Chelsea L Reighard; Scott J Hollister; David A Zopf
Journal:  J 3D Print Med       Date:  2017-12-15

3.  [Mechanical study of polyurethane elastomer and Medpor as the material of artificial auricular scaffold].

Authors:  Ge Liu; Qian Wang; Qinghua Yang; Ling Zhang; Weiwei Dong; Ying Liu; Rui Guo; Jingjian Han
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-04-15

4.  Biomechanical Characterisation of the Human Auricular Cartilages; Implications for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  M F Griffin; Y Premakumar; A M Seifalian; M Szarko; P E M Butler
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Structure and mechanical properties of high-weight-bearing and low-weight-bearing areas of hip cartilage at the micro- and nano-levels.

Authors:  Jiang-Bo Guo; Ting Liang; Yan-Jun Che; Hui-Lin Yang; Zong-Ping Luo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Auricle shaping using 3D printing and autologous diced cartilage.

Authors:  Junlin Liao; Yong Chen; Jia Chen; Bin He; Li Qian; Jiaqin Xu; Aijun Wang; Qingfeng Li; Hongju Xie; Jianda Zhou
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Biofabrication of a shape-stable auricular structure for the reconstruction of ear deformities.

Authors:  I A Otto; P E Capendale; J P Garcia; M de Ruijter; R F M van Doremalen; M Castilho; T Lawson; M W Grinstaff; C C Breugem; M Kon; R Levato; J Malda
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2021-01-21

8.  Human adult, pediatric and microtia auricular cartilage harbor fibronectin-adhering progenitor cells with regenerative ear reconstruction potential.

Authors:  Iris A Otto; Paulina Nuñez Bernal; Margot Rikkers; Mattie H P van Rijen; Anneloes Mensinga; Moshe Kon; Corstiaan C Breugem; Riccardo Levato; Jos Malda
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-08-18

9.  Preclinical assessment of clinically streamlined, 3D-printed, biocompatible single- and two-stage tissue scaffolds for ear reconstruction.

Authors:  Julia R Brennan; Ashley Cornett; Brian Chang; Sarah J Crotts; Zahra Nourmohammadi; Isabelle Lombaert; Scott J Hollister; David A Zopf
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 10.  Combining regenerative medicine strategies to provide durable reconstructive options: auricular cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Zita M Jessop; Muhammad Javed; Iris A Otto; Emman J Combellack; Siân Morgan; Corstiaan C Breugem; Charles W Archer; Ilyas M Khan; William C Lineaweaver; Moshe Kon; Jos Malda; Iain S Whitaker
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 6.832

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.