Literature DB >> 25927180

Model to Estimate Threshold Mechanical Stability of Lower Lateral Cartilage.

James Hakjune Kim1, Ashley Hamamoto1, Nicole Kiyohara1, Brian J F Wong1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: In rhinoplasty, techniques used to alter the shape of the nasal tip often compromise the structural stability of the cartilage framework in the nose. Determining the minimum threshold level of cartilage stiffness required to maintain long-term structural stability is a critical aspect in performing these surgical maneuvers.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the minimum threshold mechanical stability (elastic modulus) of lower lateral cartilage (LLC) according to expert opinion.
METHODS: Five anatomically correct LLC phantoms were made from urethane via a 3-dimensional computer modeling and injection molding process. All 5 had identical geometry but varied in stiffness along the intermediate crural region (0.63-30.6 MPa). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A focus group of experienced rhinoplasty surgeons (n = 33) was surveyed at a regional professional meeting on October 25, 2013. Each survey participant was presented the 5 phantoms in a random order and asked to arrange the phantoms in order of increasing stiffness based on their sense of touch. Then, they were asked to select a single phantom out of the set that they believed to have the minimum acceptable mechanical stability for LLC to maintain proper form and function. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: A binary logistic regression was performed to calculate the probability of mechanical acceptability as a function of the elastic modulus of the LLC based on survey data. A Hosmer-Lemeshow test was performed to measure the goodness of fit between the logistic regression and survey data. The minimum threshold mechanical stability for LLC was taken at a 50% acceptability rating.
RESULTS: Phantom 4 was selected most frequently by the participants as having the minimum acceptable stiffness for LLC intermediate care. The minimum threshold mechanical stability for LLC was determined to be 3.65 MPa. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test revealed good fit between the logistic regression and survey data (χ23 = 0.92, P = .82). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study presents a novel method of modeling anatomical structures and quantifying the mechanical properties of nasal cartilage. Quantifying these parameters is an important step in guiding surgical maneuvers performed in rhinoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25927180      PMCID: PMC4543263          DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.0255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 2168-6076            Impact factor:   4.611


  21 in total

1.  Determination of strength and deformation behavior of human cartilage for the definition of significant parameters.

Authors:  W Grellmann; A Berghaus; E-J Haberland; Y Jamali; K Holweg; K Reincke; C Bierögel
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.396

2.  Compressive biomechanical properties of human nasal septal cartilage.

Authors:  Jeremy D Richmon; August Sage; W Van Wong; Albert C Chen; Robert L Sah; Deborah Watson; Deborah Watston
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct

3.  Cartilage shaping with the Er:YAG laser: an in vivo experimental study.

Authors:  Meltem Ayhan; Orgun Deren; Metin Görgü; Bülent Erdoğan; Ayse Dursun
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Stress relaxation in porcine septal cartilage during electromechanical reshaping: mechanical and electrical responses.

Authors:  Dmitriy E Protsenko; Kevin Ho; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Engineering cartilage tissues with the shape of human nasal alar by using chondrocyte macroaggregate--Experiment study in rabbit model.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Fulin Chen; Xue Feng; Yanpu Liu; Tianqiu Mao
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Mechanical quality of tissue engineered cartilage: results after 6 and 12 weeks in vivo.

Authors:  G N Duda; A Haisch; M Endres; C Gebert; D Schroeder; J E Hoffmann; M Sittinger
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000

7.  Tensile biomechanical properties of human nasal septal cartilage.

Authors:  Jeremy D Richmon; August B Sage; Van W Wong; Albert C Chen; Christine Pan; Robert L Sah; Deborah Watson
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

8.  Precultivation of engineered human nasal cartilage enhances the mechanical properties relevant for use in facial reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Jian Farhadi; Ilario Fulco; Sylvie Miot; Dieter Wirz; Martin Haug; Sally C Dickinson; Anthony P Hollander; A U Daniels; Gerhard Pierer; Michael Heberer; Ivan Martin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The morphology and biomechanical characteristics of subcutaneously implanted tissue-engineered human septal cartilage.

Authors:  Andreas Haisch; Georg N Duda; Daniel Schroeder; Andreas Gröger; Christopher Gebert; Korinna Leder; Michael Sittinger
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Radiofrequency cartilage reshaping: efficacy, biophysical measurements, and tissue viability.

Authors:  Michael W Keefe; Alexandre Rasouli; Sergey A Telenkov; Amir M Karamzadeh; Thomas E Milner; Roger L Crumley; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb
View more
  3 in total

1.  A Finite Element Model to Simulate Formation of the Inverted-V Deformity.

Authors:  Tjoson Tjoa; Cyrus T Manuel; Ryan P Leary; Rani Harb; Dmitriy E Protsenko; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.611

2.  Quantifying Optimal Columellar Strut Dimensions for Nasal Tip Stabilization After Rhinoplasty via Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Jessica R Gandy; Cyrus T Manuel; Ryan P Leary; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 4.611

3.  Estimation of Nasal Tip Support Using Computer-Aided Design and 3-Dimensional Printed Models.

Authors:  Eric Gray; Marlon Maducdoc; Cyrus Manuel; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.611

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.