Literature DB >> 16061846

New paradigm in dose-finding trials: patient-specific dosing and beyond phase I.

André Rogatko1, James S Babb, Mourad Tighiouart, Fadlo R Khuri, Gary Hudes.   

Abstract

We propose a new paradigm for the clinical evaluation of new cancer therapies. It entails adjusting the search for the optimal dose on the basis of measurable patient characteristics that may be predictive of adverse responses to treatment, and extending this search beyond phase I and into phases II and III. We provide examples of (a) how the fine-tuning of dose may involve utilization of patient-specific attributes to obtain a personalized treatment regimen, and (b) how novel methods for phase I design can be used to update the working dose for the conduct of phase II and III cancer clinical trials. These examples should be interpreted as an enticement for the development of new methods to implement the proposed new paradigm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16061846     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  9 in total

Review 1.  The changing landscape of phase I trials in oncology.

Authors:  Kit Man Wong; Anna Capasso; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Phase I oncology studies: evidence that in the era of targeted therapies patients on lower doses do not fare worse.

Authors:  Rajul K Jain; J Jack Lee; David Hong; Maurie Markman; Jing Gong; Aung Naing; Jennifer Wheler; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Patient-centered dosing: oncologists' perspectives about treatment-related side effects and individualized dosing for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Authors:  Anne L Loeser; Lucy Gao; Aditya Bardia; Mark E Burkard; Kevin M Kalinsky; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Hope S Rugo; Martha Carlson; Janice Cowden; Lesley Glenn; Julia Maues; Sheila McGlown; Andy Ni; Natalia Padron; Maryam Lustberg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.624

4.  A phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of CKD-732, an antiangiogenic agent, in patients with refractory solid cancer.

Authors:  Sang Joon Shin; Hei-Cheul Jeung; Joong Bae Ahn; Sun Young Rha; Jae Kyung Roh; Kyung Soo Park; Dal-Hyun Kim; Chin Kim; Hyun Cheol Chung
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Inferences About Drug Safety in Phase III Trials in Oncology: Examples From Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Joshua Z Drago; Mithat Gönen; Gita Thanarajasingam; Chana A Sacks; Michael J Morris; Philip W Kantoff; Konrad H Stopsack
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; J Jack Lee; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  The Integrated Web Portal for Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC).

Authors:  Haibin Wang; Mourad Tighiouart; Shao-Chi Huang; Dror Berel; Galen Cook-Wiens; Catherine Bresee; Quanlin Li; André Rogatko
Journal:  Open Med Inform J       Date:  2013-05-31

8.  Dose-escalation strategies which use subgroup information.

Authors:  Amy Cotterill; Thomas Jaki
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 1.894

9.  Flexible, rule-based dose escalation: The cohort-sequence design.

Authors:  Shuang Li; Xian-Jin Xie; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2020-02-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.