Anne L Loeser1, Lucy Gao2, Aditya Bardia3, Mark E Burkard4, Kevin M Kalinsky5, Jeffrey Peppercorn3, Hope S Rugo6, Martha Carlson1, Janice Cowden1, Lesley Glenn1, Julia Maues1, Sheila McGlown1, Andy Ni7, Natalia Padron1, Maryam Lustberg8. 1. Patient-Centered Dosing Initiative, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 2. Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. lgao11@partners.org. 3. Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 4. University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA. 5. Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 6. University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA. 7. Division of Biostatistics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. 8. Smilow Cancer Hospital, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is treatable, it is not curable and most patients remain on treatment indefinitely. While oncologists commonly prescribe the recommended starting dose (RSD) from the FDA-approved label, patient tolerance may differ from that seen in clinical trials. We report on a survey of medical oncologists' perspectives about treatment-related toxicity and willingness to discuss flexible dosing with patients. METHODS: We disseminated a confidential survey via social media/email in Spring 2021. Eligible respondents needed to be US-based medical oncologists with experience treating patients with MBC. RESULTS: Of 131 responses, 119 were eligible. Physicians estimated that 47% of their patients reported distressing treatment-related side effects; of these, 15% visited the Emergency Room/hospital and 37% missed treatment. 74% (n = 87) of doctors reported improvement of patient symptoms after dose reduction. 87% (n = 104) indicated that they had ever, if appropriate, initiated treatment at lower doses. Most (85%, n = 101) respondents did not believe that the RSD is always more effective than a lower dose and 97% (n = 115) were willing to discuss individualized dosing with patients. CONCLUSION: Treatment-related side effects are prevalent among patients with MBC, resulting in missed treatments and acute care visits. To help patients tolerate treatment, oncologists may decrease initial and/or subsequent doses. The majority of oncologists reject the premise that a higher dose is always superior and are willing to discuss individualized dosing with patients. Given potential improvements regarding quality of life and clinical care, dose modifications should be part of routine shared decision-making between patients and oncologists.
PURPOSE: Although metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is treatable, it is not curable and most patients remain on treatment indefinitely. While oncologists commonly prescribe the recommended starting dose (RSD) from the FDA-approved label, patient tolerance may differ from that seen in clinical trials. We report on a survey of medical oncologists' perspectives about treatment-related toxicity and willingness to discuss flexible dosing with patients. METHODS: We disseminated a confidential survey via social media/email in Spring 2021. Eligible respondents needed to be US-based medical oncologists with experience treating patients with MBC. RESULTS: Of 131 responses, 119 were eligible. Physicians estimated that 47% of their patients reported distressing treatment-related side effects; of these, 15% visited the Emergency Room/hospital and 37% missed treatment. 74% (n = 87) of doctors reported improvement of patient symptoms after dose reduction. 87% (n = 104) indicated that they had ever, if appropriate, initiated treatment at lower doses. Most (85%, n = 101) respondents did not believe that the RSD is always more effective than a lower dose and 97% (n = 115) were willing to discuss individualized dosing with patients. CONCLUSION: Treatment-related side effects are prevalent among patients with MBC, resulting in missed treatments and acute care visits. To help patients tolerate treatment, oncologists may decrease initial and/or subsequent doses. The majority of oncologists reject the premise that a higher dose is always superior and are willing to discuss individualized dosing with patients. Given potential improvements regarding quality of life and clinical care, dose modifications should be part of routine shared decision-making between patients and oncologists.
Authors: I Kuchuk; N Bouganim; K Beusterien; J Grinspan; L Vandermeer; S Gertler; S F Dent; X Song; R Segal; S Mazzarello; F Crawley; G Dranitsaris; M Clemons Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Lei Nie; Eric H Rubin; Nitin Mehrotra; José Pinheiro; Laura L Fernandes; Amit Roy; Stuart Bailey; Dinesh P de Alwis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Charles S Cleeland; Jeff D Allen; Samantha A Roberts; Joanna M Brell; Sergio A Giralt; Aarif Y Khakoo; Rebecca A Kirch; Virginia E Kwitkowski; Zhongxing Liao; Jamey Skillings Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 66.675