Ross M G Norman1, Shôn W Lewis, Max Marshall. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Western Ontario, Room 113B, WMCH Building, 392 South Street, London, Ontario N6A 4G5, Canada. rnorman@uwo.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A major reason for interest in early intervention for psychotic disorders is the hypothesised relationship between longer duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) and poorer outcome of treatment. AIMS: To critically examine the evidence concerning DUP being related to treatment outcome and possible mediators of any such relationship. METHOD: A systematic review of studies in which DUP is assessed and its relationship to treatment outcome is examined. In addition, studies relevant to possible neurotoxic effects of DUP were reviewed. RESULTS: The research is entirely of a correlational nature and, therefore, firm conclusions regarding causation are not possible. There is, however, substantial evidence of DUP being an independent predictor of treatment outcome, particularly remission of positive symptoms, over the first year or so of treatment. Findings regarding the possible neurotoxic effects of DUP are inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: There continues to be evidence consistent with DUP influencing aspects of treatment outcome. Non-correlational studies, such as quasi-experimental designs, could provide stronger evidence regarding causality.
BACKGROUND: A major reason for interest in early intervention for psychotic disorders is the hypothesised relationship between longer duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) and poorer outcome of treatment. AIMS: To critically examine the evidence concerning DUP being related to treatment outcome and possible mediators of any such relationship. METHOD: A systematic review of studies in which DUP is assessed and its relationship to treatment outcome is examined. In addition, studies relevant to possible neurotoxic effects of DUP were reviewed. RESULTS: The research is entirely of a correlational nature and, therefore, firm conclusions regarding causation are not possible. There is, however, substantial evidence of DUP being an independent predictor of treatment outcome, particularly remission of positive symptoms, over the first year or so of treatment. Findings regarding the possible neurotoxic effects of DUP are inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: There continues to be evidence consistent with DUP influencing aspects of treatment outcome. Non-correlational studies, such as quasi-experimental designs, could provide stronger evidence regarding causality.
Authors: Maria Mattsson; Lena Flyckt; Gunnar Edman; Håkan Nyman; Johan Cullberg; Yvonne Forsell Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2007 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Kelly K Anderson; Aristotle Voineskos; Benoit H Mulsant; Tony P George; Kwame J Mckenzie Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Kate V Hardy; Melissa Moore; Demian Rose; Robert Bennett; Carletta Jackson-Lane; Michael Gause; Alma Jackson; Rachel Loewy Journal: Early Interv Psychiatry Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 2.732
Authors: Kelly K Anderson; Ross Norman; Arlene G MacDougall; Jordan Edwards; Lena Palaniyappan; Cindy Lau; Paul Kurdyak Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 4.356