Literature DB >> 30541819

Drug samples in family medicine teaching units: a cross-sectional descriptive study: Part 1: drug sample management policies and the relationship between the pharmaceutical industry and residents in Quebec.

Caroline Rhéaume1, Michel Labrecque2, Nadine Moisan3, Jacky Rioux4, Émilie Tardieux4, Fatoumata Binta Diallo5, Marie-Thérèse Lussier6, Andréa Lessard7, Roland Grad8, Pierre Pluye9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the existence and the level of health care professional (HCP) knowledge of local policies regarding drug sample use and the relationship between residents and the pharmaceutical industry in academic primary health care settings.
DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional survey. Health care providers were invited to complete a self-administered questionnaire on drug sample use between February and December 2013. Managers of drug samples were also asked to complete a specific questionnaire on drug sample management and policies and an inventory log sheet. Data about the existence of written policies were validated with health and social services centre (HSCC) directors or pharmacy departments and family medicine teaching unit (FMTU) directors between February and June 2014.
SETTING: All 42 FMTUs in Quebec. PARTICIPANTS: All HCPs in the FMTUs authorized to hand out drug samples (practising physicians, residents, pharmacists, and nurses). Dispensers were defined as those who reported using drug samples. Managers were defined as HCPs or staff members who managed drug samples. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Existence of written policies on drug sample use in HSCCs and FMTUs; whether FMTUs applied the HSCC policies if they existed; whether dispensers were aware of the existence of the policies; and whether policies on the relationships between residents and pharmaceutical companies existed.
RESULTS: Among the 42 FMTUs, 33 (79%) kept drug samples. Of these, 30% (10 of 33) did not have policies about drug samples in the FMTU or in the HSCC. A total of 67% (579 of 859) of HCPs from these FMTUs reported using drug samples. Most dispensers did not know if a policy existed in their FMTU (n = 297; 51%) or their HSCC (n = 420; 73%). Eleven (26%) of the 42 FMTU directors reported having a policy regarding relationships between residents and the pharmaceutical industry. Most drug sample dispensers were not aware whether such a policy existed (n = 310; 54%).
CONCLUSION: Many FMTUs did not have policies regarding drug samples or relationships between residents and the pharmaceutical industry. Variation in use and management of drug samples and the lack of knowledge of HCPs about the existence of policies point to the need to implement uniform policies in all FMTUs in Quebec. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30541819      PMCID: PMC6371883     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  19 in total

1.  Effect of antihypertensive samples on physician prescribing patterns.

Authors:  John M Boltri; Elizabeth R Gordon; Robert L Vogel
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Effect of drug sample removal on prescribing in a family practice clinic.

Authors:  Daniel M Hartung; David Evans; Dean G Haxby; Dale F Kraemer; Gabriel Andeen; Lyle J Fagnan
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Dangerous liaisons: doctors-in-training and the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  A M J Pokorny; C B Gittins
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.048

4.  Do drug samples influence resident prescribing behavior? A randomized trial.

Authors:  Richard F Adair; Leah R Holmgren
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 5.  Interactions between pharmaceutical representatives and doctors in training. A thematic review.

Authors:  Daniella A Zipkin; Michael A Steinman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Pharma influence widespread at medical schools: study.

Authors:  Wendy Glauser
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Drug samples in family medicine teaching units: a cross-sectional descriptive study: Part 3: availability and use of drug samples in Quebec.

Authors:  Marie-Thérèse Lussier; Fatoumata Binta Diallo; Pierre Pluye; Roland Grad; Andréa Lessard; Caroline Rhéaume; Michel Labrecque
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Too few, too weak: conflict of interest policies at Canadian medical schools.

Authors:  Adrienne Shnier; Joel Lexchin; Barbara Mintzes; Annemarie Jutel; Kelly Holloway
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  No more free drug samples?

Authors:  Susan Chimonas; Jerome P Kassirer
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Questionable content of an industry-supported medical school lecture series: a case study.

Authors:  Navindra Persaud
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.903

View more
  3 in total

1.  Drug samples in family medicine teaching units: a cross-sectional descriptive study: Part 2: portrait of drug sample management in Quebec.

Authors:  Andréa Lessard; Marie-Thérèse Lussier; Fatoumata Binta Diallo; Michel Labrecque; Caroline Rhéaume; Pierre Pluye; Roland Grad
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Reflective practice.

Authors:  Nicholas Pimlott
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Drug samples in family medicine teaching units: a cross-sectional descriptive study: Part 3: availability and use of drug samples in Quebec.

Authors:  Marie-Thérèse Lussier; Fatoumata Binta Diallo; Pierre Pluye; Roland Grad; Andréa Lessard; Caroline Rhéaume; Michel Labrecque
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.275

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.