Literature DB >> 16048783

Estimation of effective population sizes from data on genetic markers.

Jinliang Wang1.   

Abstract

The effective population size (Ne) is an important parameter in ecology, evolutionary biology and conservation biology. It is, however, notoriously difficult to estimate, mainly because of the highly stochastic nature of the processes of inbreeding and genetic drift for which Ne is usually defined and measured, and because of the many factors (such as time and spatial scales, systematic forces) confounding such processes. Many methods have been developed in the past three decades to estimate the current, past and ancient effective population sizes using different information extracted from some genetic markers in a sample of individuals. This paper reviews the methodologies proposed for estimating Ne from genetic data using information on heterozygosity excess, linkage disequilibrium, temporal changes in allele frequency, and pattern and amount of genetic variation within and between populations. For each methodology, I describe mainly the logic and genetic model on which it is based, the data required and information used, the interpretation of the estimate obtained, some results from applications to simulated or empirical datasets and future developments that are needed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16048783      PMCID: PMC1847562          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  85 in total

1.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Bayes estimation of species divergence times and ancestral population sizes using DNA sequences from multiple loci.

Authors:  Bruce Rannala; Ziheng Yang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION.

Authors:  M KIMURA; J F CROW
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Inferences of species phylogeny in relation to segregation of ancient polymorphisms.

Authors:  C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Estimating effective population size from samples of sequences: inefficiency of pairwise and segregating sites as compared to phylogenetic estimates.

Authors:  J Felsenstein
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Gene trees, species trees and the segregation of ancestral alleles.

Authors:  R R Hudson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genealogical inference from microsatellite data.

Authors:  I J Wilson; D J Balding
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Estimating ancestral population parameters.

Authors:  J Wakeley; J Hey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The sampling distribution of linkage disequilibrium under an infinite allele model without selection.

Authors:  R R Hudson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Inferences about linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  B S Weir
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  103 in total

1.  Changes in the genetic structure of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) populations in Queensland, Australia, across two seasons: implications for potential mosquito releases.

Authors:  N M Endersby; A A Hoffmann; V L White; S A Ritchie; P H Johnson; A R Weeks
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.278

2.  Divergent evolution of molecular markers during laboratory adaptation in Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  Pedro Simões; Marta Pascual; Maria Manuela Coelho; Margarida Matos
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Exploring the causes of small effective population sizes in cyst nematodes using artificial Globodera pallida populations.

Authors:  Josselin Montarry; Sylvie Bardou-Valette; Romain Mabon; Pierre-Loup Jan; Sylvain Fournet; Eric Grenier; Eric J Petit
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  A coalescent-based estimator of admixture from DNA sequences.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Temporal estimates of effective population size in species with overlapping generations.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Masashi Yokota
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  The repatterning of eukaryotic genomes by random genetic drift.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Louis-Marie Bobay; Francesco Catania; Jean-François Gout; Mina Rho
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 8.929

7.  A century-long genetic record reveals that protist effective population sizes are comparable to those of macroscopic species.

Authors:  Phillip C Watts; Nina Lundholm; Sofia Ribeiro; Marianne Ellegaard
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Small Bottleneck Size in a Highly Multipartite Virus during a Complete Infection Cycle.

Authors:  Romain Gallet; Frédéric Fabre; Gaël Thébaud; Mircea T Sofonea; Anne Sicard; Stéphane Blanc; Yannis Michalakis
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 9.  Tsetse flies: genetics, evolution, and role as vectors.

Authors:  E S Krafsur
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 3.342

10.  Repeated praziquantel treatments remodel the genetic and spatial landscape of schistosomiasis risk and transmission.

Authors:  Lúcio M Barbosa; Eliana A Reis; Cláudio R A Dos Santos; Jackson M Costa; Theomira M Carmo; Peace T Aminu; Thassila N Pitanga; Rafael Ponce-Terashima; Walter A Blank; Luciano K Silva; Mitermayer G Reis; Ronald E Blanton
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.