Literature DB >> 16048623

Doctors' consultations with children and their parents: a model of competencies, outcomes and confounding influences.

Jim Crossley1, Helena Davies.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The clinical consultation is an important aspect of the doctor's role. However, there is a particular shortage of methods for assessing its quality, and its complexity makes it a considerable assessment challenge. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the key components of consultations involving children?
METHODS: (1) A content analysis of relevant published and unpublished literature. (2) A nominal group consensus exercise with experienced paediatricians.
RESULTS: The content analysis and consensus exercise suggested similar lists of doctor's characteristics, tasks and outcomes as being important components of the consultation. Doctor's characteristics include: clinical judgement, clinical knowledge, physical examination, information gathering, clinical questioning, information giving, patient-centredness, parent-centredness, interpersonal skills, and consultation management. Important tasks include: organisation and efficiency, rapport, information gathering, getting the family perspective, examination and procedures, evaluation, medically appropriate plans, family appropriate plans, enhancing understanding and recall, achieving consensus, sharing responsibility, family knows how to get further help and liaison with other relevant health-care professionals. Important outcomes include: family satisfaction, family perceptions, compliance, health, health-related problems and doctor's satisfaction. The studies reviewed in the literature also provided a catalogue of factors that have been shown to influence the doctor-patient interaction that could potentially confound the assessment of a doctor's performance. These include the doctor's: age, gender, training, speciality, income, social class and politics; the patient's: age, gender, health, prognosis, social class, education, health beliefs and preferences about control and risk. The length of the acquaintance between doctor and patient, and the workload and case-mix in the clinic also affect the interaction. In several studies it is clear that particular combinations of doctor-type and patient-type have especially good or bad interactions. CONCLUSIONS AND FURTHER WORK: These components are synthesised in a single model of the doctor-patient interaction to guide the development and evaluation of assessment instruments aimed at consultations involving children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16048623     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02231.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  15 in total

1.  Talking to children.

Authors:  Quentin Spender
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Mapping interpersonal communication between pediatricians and mothers: understandings, interdependencies and gaps.

Authors:  Devalina Mookerjee
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Making choices about medical interventions: the experience of disabled young people with degenerative conditions.

Authors:  Wendy A Mitchell
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Healthcare provider-child-parent communication in the preoperative surgical setting.

Authors:  Zeev N Kain; Jill E MacLaren; Carrie Hammell; Cristina Novoa; Michelle A Fortier; Heather Huszti; Linda Mayes
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.556

5.  Modeling the information preferences of parents of children with mental health problems: a discrete choice conjoint experiment.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Don H Buchanan; Michelle Gold; Katherine Sdao-Jarvie; Michael Boyle
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2008-05-15

Review 6.  Teaching and learning consultation skills for paediatric practice.

Authors:  R J Howells; H A Davies; J D Silverman
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Living with diabetes: quality of care and quality of life.

Authors:  Pilar Isla Pera
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Nurses' evaluation of physicians' non-clinical performance in emergency departments: advantages, disadvantages and lessons learned.

Authors:  Mohamad Alameddine; Afif Mufarrij; Miriam Saliba; Yara Mourad; Rima Jabbour; Eveline Hitti
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  A theoretical framework to describe communication processes during medical disability assessment interviews.

Authors:  H Jolanda van Rijssen; Antonius J M Schellart; Johannes R Anema; Allard J van der Beek
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Evaluation of the peer teaching program at the University Children´s Hospital Essen - a single center experience.

Authors:  Rainer Büscher; Dominik Weber; Anja Büscher; Maite Hölscher; Sandra Pohlhuis; Bernhard Groes; Peter F Hoyer
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2013-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.