Literature DB >> 18481167

Modeling the information preferences of parents of children with mental health problems: a discrete choice conjoint experiment.

Charles E Cunningham1, Ken Deal, Heather Rimas, Don H Buchanan, Michelle Gold, Katherine Sdao-Jarvie, Michael Boyle.   

Abstract

Although materials informing parents about children's mental health (CMH) problems can improve outcomes, we know relatively little about the design factors that might influence their utilization of available resources. We used a discrete choice conjoint experiment to model the information preferences of parents seeking mental health services for 6 to 18 year olds. Parents completed 30 choice tasks presenting experimentally varied combinations of 20 four-level CMH information content, transfer process, and outcome attributes. Latent class analysis revealed three segments with different preferences. Parents in the Action segment (43%) chose materials providing step-by-step solutions to behavioral or emotional problems. They preferred weekly meetings with other parents and coaching calls from a therapist. The Information segment (41%) chose materials helping them understand rather than solve their child's problems. These parents were more sensitive to logistical factors such as receiving information in groups, the location where information was available, the modality in which the information was presented, and the time required to obtain and use the information. The Overwhelmed segment (16%) reported more oppositional and conduct problems, felt their children's difficulties exerted a greater adverse impact on family functioning, and reported higher personal depression scores than those in the Action or Information segments. Nonetheless, they did not choose information about, or solutions to, the problems their children presented. Simulations predicted that maximizing utilization and realizing the potential benefits of CMH information would require knowledge transfer strategies consistent with each segment's preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18481167     DOI: 10.1007/s10802-008-9238-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol        ISSN: 0091-0627


  48 in total

Review 1.  Social skills deficits associated with depression.

Authors:  C Segrin
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-04

2.  Parental knowledge of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and opinions of treatment options: impact on enrollment and adherence to a 12-month treatment trial.

Authors:  P Corkum; P Rimer; R Schachar
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.356

3.  Preferences for treatment outcomes in patients with heart failure: symptoms versus survival.

Authors:  E J Stanek; M B Oates; W F McGhan; D Denofrio; E Loh
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 4.  Cognitive vulnerability to depression: a dual process model.

Authors:  Christopher G Beevers
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-11

5.  Predicting adherence to recommendations by parents of clinic-referred children.

Authors:  K L MacNaughton; J R Rodrigue
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2001-04

6.  Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate?

Authors:  N K Arora; C A McHorney
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Tri-ministry study: correlates of school-based parenting course utilization.

Authors:  C E Cunningham; M Boyle; D Offord; Y Racine; J Hundert; M Secord; J McDonald
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2000-10

8.  A comparison of attentional biases and memory biases in women with social phobia and major depression.

Authors:  Mike Rinck; Eni S Becker
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2005-02

9.  Patterns of attentional deficits and emotional bias in bipolar and major depressive disorder.

Authors:  N Kerr; J Scott; M L Phillips
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  2005-09

10.  Medical decision-making and the patient: understanding preference patterns for growth hormone therapy using conjoint analysis.

Authors:  J Singh; L Cuttler; M Shin; J B Silvers; D Neuhauser
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  36 in total

1.  Using Best-Worst Scaling to Measure Caregiver Preferences for Managing their Child's ADHD: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Susan dosReis; Xinyi Ng; Emily Frosch; Gloria Reeves; Charles Cunningham; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Analysis of patients' preferences: direct assessment and discrete-choice experiment in therapy of adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Axel C Mühlbacher; Matthias Nübling
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Modeling the bullying prevention program preferences of educators: a discrete choice conjoint experiment.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Tracy Vaillancourt; Heather Rimas; Ken Deal; Lesley Cunningham; Kathy Short; Yvonne Chen
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2009-10

Review 4.  Systematic Review of Patients' and Parents' Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care.

Authors:  Nicole K Schatz; Gregory A Fabiano; Charles E Cunningham; Susan dosReis; Daniel A Waschbusch; Stephanie Jerome; Kellina Lupas; Karen L Morris
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  The interim service preferences of parents waiting for children's mental health treatment: a discrete choice conjoint experiment.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Yvonne Chen; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Patrick McGrath; Graham Reid; Ellen Lipman; Penny Corkum
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2013-08

6.  Challenges in children's enrolment to psychosocial services.

Authors:  Andre Sourander
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.785

7.  TOWARDS PATIENT-CENTERED CARE FOR DEPRESSION: CONJOINT METHODS TO TAILOR TREATMENT BASED ON PREFERENCES.

Authors:  Marsha N Wittink; Mark Cary; Thomas Tenhave; Jonathan Baron; Joseph J Gallo
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Do Parent Preferences for Child Conduct Problem Interventions Impact Parenting Outcomes? A Pilot Study in Community Children's Mental Health Settings.

Authors:  Yaliu He; Abigail H Gewirtz; Susanne Lee; Gerald August
Journal:  J Marital Fam Ther       Date:  2018-02-09

9.  Parent perspectives from participating in a family component for CBITS: Acceptability of a culturally informed school-based program.

Authors:  Catherine DeCarlo Santiago; Anne K Fuller; Jaclyn M Lennon; Sheryl H Kataoka
Journal:  Psychol Trauma       Date:  2015-09-21

10.  Providing information to parents of children with mental health problems: a discrete choice conjoint analysis of professional preferences.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Yvonne Chen; Don H Buchanan; Kathie Sdao-Jarvie
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2009-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.