Literature DB >> 16046692

Transforming the tobacco market: why the supply of cigarettes should be transferred from for-profit corporations to non-profit enterprises with a public health mandate.

C Callard1, D Thompson, N Collishaw.   

Abstract

Current tobacco control strategies seek primarily to decrease the demand for cigarettes through measures that encourage individuals to adopt healthier behaviours. These measures are impeded and undermined by tobacco corporations, whose profit drive compels them to seek to maintain and expand cigarette sales. Tobacco corporations seek to expand cigarette sales because they are for-profit business corporations and are obliged under law to maximise profits, even when this results in harm to others. It is not legally possible for a for-profit corporation to relinquish its responsibility to make profits or for it to temper this obligation with responsibilities to support health. Tobacco could be supplied through other non-profit enterprises. The elimination of profit driven behaviour from the supply of tobacco would enhance the ability of public health authorities to reduce tobacco use. Future tobacco control strategies can seek to transform the tobacco market from one occupied by for-profit corporations to one where tobacco is supplied by institutions that share a health mandate and will help to reduce smoking and smoking related disease and death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16046692      PMCID: PMC1748051          DOI: 10.1136/tc.2005.011353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  10 in total

1.  What is the future for the tobacco industry?

Authors:  C Bates
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Consolidation in the tobacco industry.

Authors:  R Hammond
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Political ideology and tobacco control.

Authors:  J E Cohen; N Milio; R G Rozier; R Ferrence; M J Ashley; A O Goldstein
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  What the public thinks about the tobacco industry and its products.

Authors:  M J Ashley; J E Cohen
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 5.  Where to for tobacco regulation: time for new approaches?

Authors:  Jonathan Liberman
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2003-12

6.  [Alkalization, ammonia and urea in urine in kidney diseases].

Authors:  A KLISIECKI; Z WIKTOR; M PYTASZ; L DEC
Journal:  Pol Tyg Lek       Date:  1961-12-25

7.  The impact of anti-tobacco industry prevention messages in tobacco producing regions: evidence from the US truth campaign.

Authors:  J F Thrasher; J Niederdeppe; M C Farrelly; K C Davis; K M Ribisl; M L Haviland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 8.  The toxic-tobacco law: "appropriate remedial action".

Authors:  T A Gerace
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.222

9.  Corporate social responsibility and the tobacco industry: hope or hype?

Authors:  N Hirschhorn
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  A strategy for controlling the marketing of tobacco products: a regulated market model.

Authors:  R Borland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

  10 in total
  31 in total

1.  The future of tobacco regulation: a response to a proposal for fundamental institutional change.

Authors:  Jonathan Liberman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Philip Morris's Project Sunrise: weakening tobacco control by working with it.

Authors:  P A McDaniel; E A Smith; R E Malone
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  Tobacco industry denormalisation as a tobacco control intervention: a review.

Authors:  Ruth E Malone; Quinn Grundy; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  "The Big WHY": Philip Morris's failed search for corporate social value.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  A review of the impacts of tobacco industry privatisation: Implications for policy.

Authors:  Anna B Gilmore; Gary Fooks; Martin McKee
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2011

6.  Normalizing Tobacco? The Politics of Trade, Investment, and Tobacco Control.

Authors:  Holly Jarman
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  Tobacco manufacturers' defence against plaintiffs' claims of cancer causation: throwing mud at the wall and hoping some of it will stick.

Authors:  Sharon Milberger; Ronald M Davis; Clifford E Douglas; John K Beasley; David Burns; Thomas Houston; Donald Shopland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  The role of corporate credibility in legitimizing disease promotion.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Smoker interest in lower harm alternatives to cigarettes: national survey data.

Authors:  Nick Wilson; Ron Borland; Deepa Weerasekera; Richard Edwards; Marie Russell
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Distribution of new graphic warning labels: Are tobacco companies following regulations?

Authors:  Nick Wilson; Jo Peace; Judy Li; Richard Edwards; Janet Hoek; James Stanley; George Thomson
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 2.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.