Literature DB >> 14660771

A strategy for controlling the marketing of tobacco products: a regulated market model.

R Borland1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To outline a novel strategy for controlling the tobacco market. ARGUMENTS: More comprehensive controls over the tobacco market are essential and long overdue. Effective controls need to encourage the development of less harmful products; control commercial communication to ensure that potential harms are highlighted relative to any benefits; and provide mechanisms to move consumers away from tobacco use, or at least towards less harmful alternatives. Achieving this by regulating the existing industry is one strategy. This paper puts the case for an alternative: to have marketing controlled by an agency (called here the Tobacco Products Agency, or TPA) which tendered to manufacturers for product and which distributed to retailers in ways that reduce incentives to bend or break the law. The TPA would be backed by legislation that made tobacco a controlled substance with possession sale and use only allowed as permitted by the regulations, which in reality would be only as provided by the TPA.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall effect of such a model, which we call a "regulated market model", would be to eliminate most of the incentives and remaining opportunities for commercial promotion of tobacco and to create incentives to encourage the development of less harmful tobacco products. Such a model preserves the competition inherent in a free market, but directs it towards the challenge of reducing the harm from tobacco use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14660771      PMCID: PMC1747803          DOI: 10.1136/tc.12.4.374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R J O'Connor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Tobacco industry statements in the US Department of Justice lawsuit.

Authors:  H A Waxman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  More on the regulation of tobacco smoke: how we got here and where next.

Authors:  N Gray; L T Kozlowski
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Smoking and death: the past 40 years and the next 40.

Authors:  R Peto
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-10-08

5.  Smoking behaviours of Australian adults in 1995: trends and concerns.

Authors:  D J Hill; V M White; M M Scollo
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1998-03-02       Impact factor: 7.738

  5 in total
  31 in total

1.  The tobacco use management system: analyzing tobacco control from a systems perspective.

Authors:  Ron Borland; David Young; Ken Coghill; Jian Ying Zhang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The most important and influential papers in tobacco control: results of an online poll.

Authors:  S Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Why not seek clever regulation? A reply to Liberman.

Authors:  Ron Borland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  The future of tobacco regulation: a response to a proposal for fundamental institutional change.

Authors:  Jonathan Liberman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 5.  Transforming the tobacco market: why the supply of cigarettes should be transferred from for-profit corporations to non-profit enterprises with a public health mandate.

Authors:  C Callard; D Thompson; N Collishaw
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 6.  Tobacco industry denormalisation as a tobacco control intervention: a review.

Authors:  Ruth E Malone; Quinn Grundy; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Smokers and non-smokers talk about regulatory options in tobacco control.

Authors:  Stacy M Carter; Simon Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  "The Big WHY": Philip Morris's failed search for corporate social value.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The case for OFSMOKE: how tobacco price regulation is needed to promote the health of markets, government revenue and the public.

Authors:  Anna B Gilmore; J Robert Branston; David Sweanor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Distribution of new graphic warning labels: Are tobacco companies following regulations?

Authors:  Nick Wilson; Jo Peace; Judy Li; Richard Edwards; Janet Hoek; James Stanley; George Thomson
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 2.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.