Literature DB >> 24436615

The Use of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump in a Real-World Setting: A Comparison between Survivors and Nonsurvivors from Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated with IABP. The Jakarta Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry.

Surya Dharma1, Iwan Dakota1, Isman Firdaus1, Alexander J Wardeh2, J Wouter Jukema3.   

Abstract

Real-world data on acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who received intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support are limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of ACS patients who received IABP support from a real-world ACS registry. Patients with ACS (N = 121) who received IABP support were enrolled. Characteristics of survivors and nonsurvivors were compared at 30 days. Mortality rate of patients with ACS who received IABP was 47%. The survivors (N = 64) had less often cardiogenic shock (p < 0.001), more often IABP usage as back-up for a revascularization procedure (p = 0.002), less often resuscitation (p = 0.043), and less mechanical ventilator support (p < 0.001) than nonsurvivors. The nonsurvivors had a significantly higher leukocyte count (p = 0.033), a higher serum creatinine level (p < 0.001), a higher blood sugar on admission (p = 0.001), higher creatine kinase MB levels (p = 0.002), and a higher serum uric acid level (p < 0.001), but significantly lower left and right ventricular function (p = 0.014 and p = 0.003, respectively) than survivors. At 30 days, non-ST elevation (STE)-ACS patients had lower mortality rate than ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients (log-rank test, p < 0.001), and non-STE-ACS patients who had not suffered from cardiogenic shock showed the lowest mortality rate (log-rank test, p < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, a heart rate ≥ 100 beats per minute before IABP insertion was the strongest predictor of 30-day mortality (hazard ratio = 5.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.49 to 21.78; p = 0.011). In ACS patients presenting with either cardiogenic shock, resuscitated, or patients who needed mechanical ventilation suffered from high mortality, despite the use of IABP. IABP appears to be safe and tended to be favorable in noncardiogenic shock ACS patients, particularly non-STE-ACS. A heart rate of ≥ 100 beats per minute prior to IABP insertion was the strongest predictor of 30-day mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACS; IABP; nonsurvivor; survivor

Year:  2013        PMID: 24436615      PMCID: PMC3830567          DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1348884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Angiol        ISSN: 1061-1711


  30 in total

Review 1.  2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.

Authors:  Glenn N Levine; Eric R Bates; James C Blankenship; Steven R Bailey; John A Bittl; Bojan Cercek; Charles E Chambers; Stephen G Ellis; Robert A Guyton; Steven M Hollenberg; Umesh N Khot; Richard A Lange; Laura Mauri; Roxana Mehran; Issam D Moussa; Debabrata Mukherjee; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Henry H Ting
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in cardiogenic shock. Report of a co-operative clinical trial.

Authors:  S Scheidt; G Wilner; H Mueller; D Summers; M Lesch; G Wolff; J Krakauer; M Rubenfire; P Fleming; G Noon; N Oldham; T Killip; A Kantrowitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-05-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Temporal trends in prevalence of diabetes mellitus in a population-based cohort of incident myocardial infarction and impact of diabetes on survival.

Authors:  Gunjan Y Gandhi; Véronique L Roger; Kent R Bailey; Pasquale J Palumbo; Jeanine E Ransom; Cynthia L Leibson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Thirty-year trends (1975 to 2005) in the magnitude of, management of, and hospital death rates associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population-based perspective.

Authors:  Robert J Goldberg; Frederick A Spencer; Joel M Gore; Darleen Lessard; Jorge Yarzebski
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction).

Authors:  Elliott M Antman; Daniel T Anbe; Paul Wayne Armstrong; Eric R Bates; Lee A Green; Mary Hand; Judith S Hochman; Harlan M Krumholz; Frederick G Kushner; Gervasio A Lamas; Charles J Mullany; Joseph P Ornato; David L Pearle; Michael A Sloan; Sidney C Smith; Joseph S Alpert; Jeffrey L Anderson; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Raymond J Gibbons; Gabriel Gregoratos; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon Ann Hunt; Alice K Jacobs
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Early intra-aortic balloon pumping following perioperative myocardial injury improves hospital and mid-term prognosis.

Authors:  Antonino S Rubino; Francesco Onorati; Giuseppe Santarpino; Karim Abdalla; Santo Caroleo; Ermenigildo Santangelo; Attilio Renzulli
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-12-02

7.  Predictors of clinical course, coronary anatomy and left ventricular function after recovery from acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  G J Taylor; J O Humphries; E D Mellits; B Pitt; R A Schulze; L S Griffith; S C Achuff
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Current spectrum of cardiogenic shock and effect of early revascularization on mortality. Results of an International Registry. SHOCK Registry Investigators.

Authors:  J S Hochman; J Boland; L A Sleeper; M Porway; J Brinker; J Col; A Jacobs; J Slater; D Miller; H Wasserman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Impact of multivessel disease on reperfusion success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Paul Sorajja; Bernard J Gersh; David A Cox; Michael G McLaughlin; Peter Zimetbaum; Costantino Costantini; Thomas Stuckey; James E Tcheng; Roxana Mehran; Alexandra J Lansky; Cindy L Grines; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  In-hospital mortality and clinical course of 20,891 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction randomised between alteplase and streptokinase with or without heparin. The International Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-07-14       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  Efficacy of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump before versus after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock from ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Lin Yuan; Shao-Ping Nie
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 2.  Acute care for the three leading causes of mortality in lower-middle-income countries: A systematic review.

Authors:  Cassidy M Dahn; Olindi Wijesekera; Grace E Garcia; Konrad Karasek; Gabrielle A Jacquet
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.