Literature DB >> 16043306

Discrimination of consonance and dissonance in Java sparrows.

S Watanabe1, M Uozumi, N Tanaka.   

Abstract

Six adult Java sparrows were trained to discriminate between consonant and dissonant sounds consisting of three tones. In the consonance group, the perching response was reinforced when consonance was presented, but not when dissonance was presented. Both groups were given an inversion test, in which the first inversion of the chord was used as a stimulus. Four of six birds learned the discrimination and were given two tests. In the first test, novel consonances and novel dissonances were presented. All birds maintained the discrimination. When inverted consonances and dissonances were presented in the second test, the discriminative behavior was not well demonstrated. When novel dissonances consisting of tones with different intervals were presented in the third test, birds trained to perch for dissonance performed well, whereas those trained to perch for consonance did not. In summary, Java sparrows were able to discriminate between consonances and dissonances and demonstrated generalization to new combinations, they do not discriminate the same consonances and dissonances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16043306     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  13 in total

1.  Auditory-nerve responses predict pitch attributes related to musical consonance-dissonance for normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Preference for consonant music over dissonant music by an infant chimpanzee.

Authors:  Tasuku Sugimoto; Hiromi Kobayashi; Noritomo Nobuyoshi; Yasushi Kiriyama; Hideko Takeshita; Tomoyasu Nakamura; Kazuhide Hashiya
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.163

3.  Simultaneous consonance in music perception and composition.

Authors:  Peter M C Harrison; Marcus T Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Animal Pitch Perception: Melodies and Harmonies.

Authors:  Marisa Hoeschele
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2017

5.  Overtone-based pitch selection in hermit thrush song: unexpected convergence with scale construction in human music.

Authors:  Emily L Doolittle; Bruno Gingras; Dominik M Endres; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Processing advantages for consonance: A comparison between rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  Paola Crespo-Bojorque; Juan M Toro
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  The use of interval ratios in consonance perception by rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  Paola Crespo-Bojorque; Juan M Toro
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Prosody discrimination by songbirds (Padda oryzivora).

Authors:  Nozomi Naoi; Shigeru Watanabe; Kikuo Maekawa; Junko Hibiya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The role of the auditory brainstem in processing musically relevant pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-13

Review 10.  Searching for the origins of musicality across species.

Authors:  Marisa Hoeschele; Hugo Merchant; Yukiko Kikuchi; Yuko Hattori; Carel ten Cate
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.