Literature DB >> 16043248

Development of upper limb proprioceptive accuracy in children and adolescents.

Daniel J Goble1, Colleen A Lewis, Edward A Hurvitz, Susan H Brown.   

Abstract

This study was designed to determine differences in the proprioceptively guided movements of children (8-10 years) and adolescents (16-18 years). Participants were blindfolded and asked to actively match passively determined target positions of the elbow joint under three matching conditions. Overall, children were less accurate than adolescents in all matching tasks and utilized different kinematic strategies for making the matching movements. Specifically, children made larger absolute errors and utilized matching movements which, compared to adolescents, were of shorter duration and less irregular in terms of their velocity profiles. An assessment of limb asymmetry was also performed revealing a non-dominant arm matching advantage but only for children and only in the task requiring interhemispheric transfer of a memory-based model of limb position. The proprioceptive differences observed in this study are likely the result of experience-driven refinement in the utilization of somatosensory feedback throughout childhood and into adolescence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16043248     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2005.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  38 in total

1.  Proprioceptively guided reaching movements in 3D space: effects of age, task complexity and handedness.

Authors:  T S Schaap; T I Gonzales; T W J Janssen; S H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Compromised encoding of proprioceptively determined joint angles in older adults: the role of working memory and attentional load.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Marianne A Mousigian; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Developmental aspects of pluriarticular movement control.

Authors:  Isabelle Mackrous; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Measuring change in somatosensation across the lifespan.

Authors:  Winnie Dunn; James W Griffith; Dory Sabata; Mary T Morrison; Joy C MacDermid; Amy Darragh; Roseann Schaaf; Brian Dudgeon; Lisa Tabor Connor; Leeanne Carey; Jennifer Tanquary
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2015 May-Jun

5.  Proprioceptive ability at the lips and jaw measured using the same psychophysical discrimination task.

Authors:  Ellie Frayne; Susan Coulson; Roger Adams; Glen Croxson; Gordon Waddington
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Upper limb asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Colleen A Lewis; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Task-dependent asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback for goal-directed movement.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Assessing proprioceptive function: evaluating joint position matching methods against psychophysical thresholds.

Authors:  Naveen Elangovan; Amanda Herrmann; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-11-21

9.  The neural control of bimanual movements in the elderly: Brain regions exhibiting age-related increases in activity, frequency-induced neural modulation, and task-specific compensatory recruitment.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; James P Coxon; Annouchka Van Impe; Jeroen De Vos; Nicole Wenderoth; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Motor commands in children interfere with their haptic perception of objects.

Authors:  Monica Gori; Valentina Squeri; Alessandra Sciutti; Lorenzo Masia; Giulio Sandini; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.