Literature DB >> 16041911

Health-related quality of life and health utility for the institutional elderly in Taiwan.

Kuan-Lang Lai1, Rong-Jye Tzeng, Bing-Long Wang, Hong-Shen Lee, Roger L Amidon, Senyeong Kao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and health utility in an institutional elderly population.
METHODS: Four hundred sixty-five elderly persons living in long-term care institutions in Taiwan were interviewed using Taiwan's abbreviated version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF), rating scale (RS) and the Time-Trade-Off (TTO) utility measurement.
RESULTS: The WHOQOL-BREF showed acceptable internal consistency (alpha range: 0.75-0.80 across domains) and validity. The sexual activity facet had the lowest response rate. Educational level, number of chronic diseases, physical performance, and number of caregivers had significant (p < 0.05) impacts on the domain scores of the WHOQOL-BREF. Physical performance had the strongest impact on the physical domain (R2 = 0.40) and accounted for significant percentages of the variance on the other three domains (R2 = 0.06-0.13). The mean RS score (score 0-100) was 61.3 +/- 16.2 (mean +/- SD). The mean TTO utility (score 0-1) was 0.92 +/- 0.22.
CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that the WHOQOL-BREF, excepting the sexual activity item, is useful for evaluating HRQOL of conscious elderly in institutions. The validity of TTO utility for studying the institutionalized elderly needs further evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16041911     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-004-3061-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  30 in total

1.  Limitations of the SF-36 in a sample of nursing home residents.

Authors:  E M Andresen; G W Gravitt; M E Aydelotte; C A Podgorski
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.668

2.  Income-related health inequality in Canada.

Authors:  K H Humphries; E van Doorslaer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  The impact of the Chi-Chi earthquake on quality of life among elderly survivors in Taiwan--a before and after study.

Authors:  Mau-Roung Lin; Wenzheng Huang; Chingchaw Huang; Hei-Fen Hwang; Lung-Wen Tsai; Yun-Ning Chiu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  Health values of hospitalized elderly patients.

Authors:  C E Gessert
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The importance of patient preferences for comorbidities in cost-effectiveness analyses.

Authors:  R A Harris; R F Nease
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Patients' perceptions of nursing home stress related to quality of care.

Authors:  S Stein; M W Linn; E M Stein
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1986-08

8.  Incorporating patients' preferences into medical decisions.

Authors:  J P Kassirer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-06-30       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Performance data and survival in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  A S Jones; J E Fenton; D J Husband
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2000-10

10.  Validation of the United States' version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument.

Authors:  A E Bonomi; D L Patrick; D M Bushnell; M Martin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  8 in total

1.  Development and validation of a WHOQOL-BREF Taiwanese audio player-assisted interview version for the elderly who use a spoken dialect.

Authors:  Chi-Wen Chien; Jung-Der Wang; Grace Yao; Ching-Fan Sheu; Ching-Lin Hsieh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Which aspects of subjectively reported quality of life are important in predicting mortality beyond known risk factors? The Lothian Birth Cohort 1921 Study.

Authors:  Catherine Murray; Caroline E Brett; John M Starr; Ian J Deary
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Quality of life of childbearing age women and its associated factors: an application of seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) models.

Authors:  Sareh Keshavarzi; Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Ayatollahi; Najaf Zare; Farkhondeh Sharif
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Correlates of institutionalized senior veterans' quality of life in Taiwan.

Authors:  Hsiao-Ting Chang; Li-Fan Liu; Chun-Ku Chen; Shinn-Jang Hwang; Liang-Kung Chen; Feng-Hwa Lu
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Psychosocial factors and health as determinants of quality of life in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Caroline E Brett; Alan J Gow; Janie Corley; Alison Pattie; John M Starr; Ian J Deary
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Quality of life of Chinese urban community residents: a psychometric study of the mainland Chinese version of the WHOQOL-BREF.

Authors:  Ping Xia; Ningxiu Li; Kit-Tai Hau; Chaojie Liu; Yubo Lu
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Psycho-social impact of visual impairment on health-related quality of life among nursing home residents.

Authors:  Mahesh Kumar Dev; Nabin Paudel; Niraj Dev Joshi; Dev Narayan Shah; Shishir Subba
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Lifestyle of the employees working in hamadan public sectors: application of the trans-theoretical model.

Authors:  Jalal Abdi; Hassan Eftekhar; Mahmood Mahmoodi; Davod Shojaeizade; Roya Sadeghi
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 0.611

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.