Literature DB >> 10693897

Validation of the United States' version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument.

A E Bonomi1, D L Patrick, D M Bushnell, M Martin.   

Abstract

In 1991, the World Health Organization initiated a project to simultaneously develop a quality of life (QOL) instrument in 15 countries: The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument. This was intended as a generic QOL tool for use with patients across varying disease types, severities of illness, and cultural subgroups. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the WHOQOL-100 in the U.S., one of the original 15 participating countries. The WHOQOL is a 100-item self-report instrument consisting of 24 subscales within six domains: Physical, Psychological, Independence, Social, Environment, and Spiritual. Four additional items pertain to overall QOL/health. We tested the WHOQOL-100 (U.S. version) in a sample of 443 adults (n = 251 chronically ill, n = 128 healthy, and n = 64 childbearing) in the U.S. to test its reliability (internal consistency, test-retest), construct validity (convergent, discriminant), responsiveness, and factor structure. The WHOQOL-100 (U.S. version) has acceptable internal consistency (alpha range: 0.82-0.95 across domains) and reproducibility (ICC range: 0.83-0.96 at 2-week retest interval). It is responsive to change in clinical conditions, as evidenced by predicted score change (effect size) in women after childbirth. Construct validity was demonstrated by (1) its correlation with the Short Form-36 and Subjective Quality of Life Profile, and (2) its ability to discriminate between the diverse samples in this study. The conceptual structure was confirmed exactly with the exception of four facets that did not correlate most highly with the domains to which they were originally assigned, but these differences were minor. The WHOQOL measurement system is suitable for evaluating the QOL of adults in the U.S. The psychometric properties will be continually evaluated as more data become available in the U.S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10693897     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00123-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  106 in total

1.  Construction and validation of a quality of life instrument for young adults.

Authors:  Henian Chen; Patricia Cohen; Stephanie Kasen; Kathy Gordan; Rebecca Dufur; Elizabeth Smailes
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Development and validation of a new Prescription Quality Index.

Authors:  Norul Badriah Hassan; Hasanah Che Ismail; Lin Naing; Ronán M Conroy; Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  The Evolution of Aging With Pride-National Health, Aging, and Sexuality/Gender Study: Illuminating the Iridescent Life Course of LGBTQ Adults Aged 80 Years and Older in the United States.

Authors:  Karen Fredriksen Goldsen; Hyun-Jun Kim; Hyunzee Jung; Jayn Goldsen
Journal:  Int J Aging Hum Dev       Date:  2019-04-08

4.  Prior Military Service, Identity Stigma, and Mental Health Among Transgender Older Adults.

Authors:  Charles P Hoy-Ellis; Chengshi Shiu; Kathleen M Sullivan; Hyun-Jun Kim; Allison M Sturges; Karen I Fredriksen-Goldsen
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2017-02

5.  Who Says I Do: The Changing Context of Marriage and Health and Quality of Life for LGBT Older Adults.

Authors:  Jayn Goldsen; Amanda E B Bryan; Hyun-Jun Kim; Anna Muraco; Sarah Jen; Karen I Fredriksen-Goldsen
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2017-02

6.  Patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy: a prospective case-control study.

Authors:  Catharina A Goossens-Laan; Paul J M Kil; J L H Ruud Bosch; Jolanda De Vries
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Three-pronged assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder and its consequences: personality functioning, pathological traits, and psychosocial disability.

Authors:  Lee Anna Clark; Eunyoe Ro
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2014-01

8.  Quality of life in the Danish general population--normative data and validity of WHOQOL-BREF using Rasch and item response theory models.

Authors:  V Noerholm; M Groenvold; T Watt; J B Bjorner; N A Rasmussen; P Bech
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Quality of life among free clinic patients associated with somatic symptoms, depression, and perceived neighborhood environment.

Authors:  Akiko Kamimura; Nancy Christensen; Jamie A Prevedel; Jennifer Tabler; Brian J Hamilton; Jeanie Ashby; Justine J Reel
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-06

10.  Don't wanna go through that madness no more: quality of life satisfaction as predictor of sustained remission from illicit drug misuse.

Authors:  Alexandre B Laudet; Jeffrey B Becker; William L White
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.164

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.