Literature DB >> 16041206

Two-surgeon technique for hepatic parenchymal transection of the noncirrhotic liver using saline-linked cautery and ultrasonic dissection.

Thomas A Aloia1, Daria Zorzi, Eddie K Abdalla, Jean-Nicolas Vauthey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze our experience with saline-linked cautery in hepatic surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Safe and efficient hepatic parenchymal transection is predicated on the ability to simultaneously address 2 tasks: parenchymal dissection and hemostasis. To date, no single instrument has been designed that addresses both of these tasks. Saline-linked cautery is now widely used in liver surgery and is reported to decrease blood loss during liver transection, but data on its exact benefits are lacking.
METHODS: From a single institution, prospective liver surgery database, we identified 32 consecutive patients with noncirrhotic livers who underwent resection for primary or metastatic disease using a 2-surgeon technique with saline-linked cautery and ultrasonic dissection (SLC+UD) from December 2002 to January 2004. From the same database, we identified a contemporary and matched set of 32 patients who underwent liver resection with similar indications using ultrasonic dissection alone (UD alone). Operative and anesthetic variables were retrospectively analyzed to identify differences between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: The 2 groups were equivalent in terms of age, gender, tumor histology, tumor number, and tumor size. The UD+SLC group had a decreased duration of inflow occlusion (20 minutes versus 30 minutes, P = 0.01), blood loss (150 mL versus 250 mL, P = 0.034), and operative time (187 minutes versus 211 minutes, P = 0.027). Postoperative liver function and complication rates were similar in each group.
CONCLUSIONS: The 2-surgeon technique for liver parenchymal transection using SLC and UD in noncirrhotic livers is safe and may provide advantages over other techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16041206      PMCID: PMC1357721          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000171300.62318.f4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  20 in total

1.  New simple technique for hepatic parenchymal resection using a Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator and bipolar cautery equipped with a channel for water dripping.

Authors:  Y Yamamoto; I Ikai; M Kume; Y Sakai; A Yamauchi; H Shinohara; T Morimoto; Y Shimahara; M Yamamoto; Y Yamaoka
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  New technique for liver resection using heat coagulative necrosis.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Weber; Giuseppe Navarra; Long R Jiao; Joanna P Nicholls; Steen Lindkaer Jensen; Nagy A Habib
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Pringle's manoeuvre in living donors.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imamura; Tadatoshi Takayama; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Norihiko Kokudo; Taku Aoki; Jun-ichi Kaneko; Yutaka Matsuyama; Keiji Sano; Atsushi Maema; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002 Dec 21-28       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Use of a bipolar vessel-sealing device for parenchymal transection during liver surgery.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; Jeffrey A Drebin; David Linehan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Jet-cutting supported by high frequency current: new technique for hepatic surgery.

Authors:  H G Rau; E R Buttler; G Baretton; H M Schardey; F W Schildberg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Protective effects of ischemic preconditioning for liver resection performed under inflow occlusion in humans.

Authors:  P A Clavien; S Yadav; D Sindram; R C Bentley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection.

Authors:  J Belghiti; K Hiramatsu; S Benoist; P Massault; A Sauvanet; O Farges
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: toward zero hospital deaths.

Authors:  S T Fan; C M Lo; C L Liu; C M Lam; W K Yuen; C Yeung; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Haemostasis after partial hepatectomy using argon beam coagulation.

Authors:  R R Postema; P W Plaisier; F J ten Kate; O T Terpstra
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection.

Authors:  Y Fong; M F Brennan; K Brown; N Heffernan; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  53 in total

Review 1.  Hepatic resection for colorectal metastases: the impact of surgical margin status on outcome.

Authors:  George A Poultsides; Richard D Schulick; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Response to preoperative chemotherapy predicts survival in patients undergoing hepatectomy for liver metastases from gastric and esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Andreou; Luca Viganò; Giuseppe Zimmitti; Daniel Seehofer; Martin Dreyer; Andreas Pascher; Marcus Bahra; Wenzel Schoening; Volker Schmitz; Peter C Thuss-Patience; Timm Denecke; Gero Puhl; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Peter Neuhaus; Lorenzo Capussotti; Johann Pratschke; Sven-Christian Schmidt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Decreasing pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy: saline-coupled radiofrequency ablation in a porcine model.

Authors:  Mark J Truty; Mark D Sawyer; Florencia G Que
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Curable metastatic colorectal cancer: recommended paradigms.

Authors:  Richard N Berri; Eddie K Abdalla
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Predictors of morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy in elderly patients: analysis of 7621 NSQIP patients.

Authors:  Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Amanda B Cooper; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Steven A Curley; Thomas A Aloia
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Monopolar floating ball versus bipolar forceps for hepatic resection: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Guido Torzilli; Matteo Donadon; Matteo Marconi; Fabio Procopio; Angela Palmisano; Daniele Del Fabbro; Florin Botea; Antonino Spinelli; Marco Montorsi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Feasibility of liver resection without the use of the routine Pringle manoeuver: an analysis of 248 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Kit-fai Lee; John Wong; Wilson Ng; Yue-sun Cheung; Paul Lai
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Survival After Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor and Sarcoma Liver Metastases in 146 Patients.

Authors:  Kristoffer W Brudvik; Sameer H Patel; Christina L Roland; Claudius Conrad; Keila E Torres; Kelly K Hunt; Janice N Cormier; Barry W Feig; Thomas A Aloia; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Margin status remains an important determinant of survival after surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases in the era of modern chemotherapy.

Authors:  Andreas Andreou; Thomas A Aloia; Antoine Brouquet; Paxton V Dickson; Giuseppe Zimmitti; Dipen M Maru; Scott Kopetz; Evelyne M Loyer; Steven A Curley; Eddie K Abdalla; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Radiofrequency vessel-sealing system versus the clamp-crushing technique in liver transection: results of a prospective randomized study on 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Andrea Muratore; Alfredo Mellano; Giuseppe Tarantino; Patrizia Marsanic; Michele De Simone; Fabrizio Di Benedetto
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.