Literature DB >> 16039961

Closed versus partially ventilated endotracheal suction in extremely preterm neonates: physiologic consequences.

A M Tan1, J M Gomez, J Mathews, M Williams, J Paratz, V S Rajadurai.   

Abstract

This randomized cross over study aimed to compare the severity and incidences of desaturation and bradycardia between the partially ventilated endotracheal suction method (PVETS) and closed tracheal suction system (CTSS) in extremely preterm neonates. Fifteen intubated and ventilated extremely low birth weight preterm infants (mean birth weight 689g) randomly underwent both suction techniques within a 12-h period to obtain a paired reading group. The process was repeated 24-48h apart until three pairs of reading groups were collected. Changes in oxygen saturation measured with pulse oximetry and heart rate changes measured with electrocardiogram were recorded using Hewlett-Packard m240A monitor trending software. The mean of each parameter's variation from baseline was obtained using SPSS descriptive statistics and analyzed using SPSS repeated measures ANOVA. Fisher Exact Test was used to analyze the incidence of desaturation and bradycardia. The closed tracheal suction system reported a significantly smaller degree of oxygen saturation fall (P<0.005) and significantly fewer incidences of desaturation. There was also a significantly smaller degree of heart rate reduction although episodes of bradycardia were not significantly different between the two methods. Oxygen saturation and heart rate were significantly more stable during the use of CTSS compared to PVETS in the extremely low birth weight preterm population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 16039961     DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2004.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs        ISSN: 0964-3397            Impact factor:   3.072


  6 in total

Review 1.  Tracheal suctioning without disconnection in intubated ventilated neonates.

Authors:  Jacqueline E Taylor; Glenda Hawley; Vicki Flenady; Paul G Woodgate
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

2.  A comparison of the effectiveness of open and closed endotracheal suction.

Authors:  Beverley Copnell; David G Tingay; Nicholas J Kiraly; Magdy Sourial; Michael J Gordon; John F Mills; Colin J Morley; Peter A Dargaville
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Effects of open endotracheal suction on lung volume in infants receiving HFOV.

Authors:  D G Tingay; B Copnell; J F Mills; C J Morley; P A Dargaville
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  The effects of closed tracheal suctioning plus volume guarantee on cerebral hemodynamics.

Authors:  J R Kaiser; C H Gauss; D K Williams
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  The effect of the open and closed system suctions on cardiopulmonary parameters: time and costs in patients under mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Ali Afshari; Mahmoud Safari; Khodayar Oshvandi; Ali Reza Soltanian
Journal:  Nurs Midwifery Stud       Date:  2014-06-15

6.  The effect of open and closed endotracheal tube suctioning system on respiratory parameters of infants undergoing mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Parvin Taheri; Narges Asgari; Majid Mohammadizadeh; Mehri Golchin
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2012-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.