Literature DB >> 29322118

MR Imaging Features of Tubular Carcinoma: Preliminary Experience in Twelve Masses.

Ravza Yılmaz1, Zuhal Bayramoğlu1, Selman Emirikçi2, Semen Önder3, Artur Salmaslıoğlu1, Memduh Dursun1, Gülden Acunaş1, Vahit Özmen2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively analyzed the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features and diffusion-weighted imaging findings of the 12 masses of 10 patients with tubular carcinoma (TC), including mammography and sonography findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mammographic, sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging features in 12 histopathologically confirmed masses diagnosed as TC of the breast within 10 patients were evaluated. Morphologic characteristics, enhancement features, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were reviewed.
RESULTS: On mammography (n=5), TC appeared as high density masses with indistinct, spiculated or obscured margins. Sonographically, TC appeared as a hypoechoic appearance (n=12) with posterior acoustic shadowing in nine. On MR imaging, the margins of ten of twelve masses were irregular. Internal enhancement patterns were heterogeneous in 10 patients. Dynamic enhancement patterns illustrated plateau kinetics (n=8). On the T2-weighted images 4 masses were hypointense, and 8 were hyperintense; hypointense internal septation was found in seven of these. Tubular carcinoma appeared as hyperintense on diffusion-weighted imaging with ADC values of 0.85±0.16×10-3 mm2/s that was lower than the normal parenchyma of 1.25±0.25×10-3 mm2/s.
CONCLUSION: According to our study with a limited number of cases, tubular carcinomas can be described as hyperintense breast carcinomas with or without dark internal septation like appearance on T2-weighted images. Low ADC values from DW imaging can be used to differentiate TC from hyperintense benign breast lesions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tubular cancer; diffusion weighted imaging; hyperintense breast cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasonography

Year:  2018        PMID: 29322118      PMCID: PMC5758062          DOI: 10.5152/ejbh.2017.3543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Breast Health


  21 in total

1.  Tubular carcinoma of the breast: sensitivity of diagnostic techniques and correlation with histopathology.

Authors:  J S Mitnick; R Gianutsos; A H Pollack; M Susman; B L Baskin; W D Ko; P I Pressman; H D Feiner; D F Roses
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic and sonographic features.

Authors:  D G Sheppard; G J Whitman; P T Huynh; A A Sahin; B D Fornage; C B Stelling
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic, sonographic, clinical and pathologic findings.

Authors:  Işil Günhan-Bilgen; Ayşenur Oktay
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Nonenhancing breast malignancies on MRI: sonographic and pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Sandeep Ghai; Derek Muradali; Karina Bukhanov; Supriya Kulkarni
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Well-differentiated (tubular) carcinoma of the breast. A clinicopathologic study of 145 pure and mixed cases.

Authors:  P H Deos; H J Norris
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Detecting breast cancer with non-contrast MR imaging: combining diffusion-weighted and STIR imaging.

Authors:  Seiko Kuroki-Suzuki; Yoshifumi Kuroki; Katsuhiro Nasu; Shigeru Nawano; Noriyuki Moriyama; Masatoshi Okazaki
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.471

7.  Radial scar and tubular carcinoma. Mammographic and sonographic findings.

Authors:  A Vega; F Garijo
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic appearance.

Authors:  A J Leibman; M Lewis; B Kruse
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mode of presentation, mammographic appearance, and frequency of nodal metastases.

Authors:  B C Elson; M A Helvie; T S Frank; T E Wilson; D D Adler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion.

Authors:  C Marini; C Iacconi; M Giannelli; A Cilotti; M Moretti; C Bartolozzi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 7.034

View more
  1 in total

1.  Breast tubular carcinoma at parasternal and retro-nipple area: Two case reports.

Authors:  Junhua Shi; Junli Shi; Shengbo Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.