Literature DB >> 23772173

Using Brain Imaging for Lie Detection: Where Science, Law and Research Policy Collide.

Daniel D Langleben1, Jane Campbell Moriarty.   

Abstract

Progress in the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the brain to evaluate deception and differentiate lying from truth-telling has created anticipation of a breakthrough in the search for technology-based methods of lie detection. In the last few years, litigants have attempted to introduce fMRI lie detection evidence in courts. This article weighs in on the interdisciplinary debate about the admissibility of such evidence, identifying the missing pieces of the scientific puzzle that need to be completed if fMRI-based lie detection is to meet the standards of either legal reliability or general acceptance. We believe that the Daubert's "known error rate" is the key concept linking the legal and scientific standards. We posit that properly-controlled clinical trials are the most convincing means to determine the error rates of fMRI-based lie detection and confirm or disprove the relevance of the promising laboratory research on this topic. This article explains the current state of the science and provides an analysis of the case law in which litigants have sought to introduce fMRI lie detection. Analyzing the myriad issues related to fMRI lie detection, the article identifies the key limitations of the current neuroimaging of deception science as expert evidence and explores the problems that arise from using scientific evidence before it is proven scientifically valid and reliable. We suggest that courts continue excluding fMRI lie detection evidence until this potentially useful form of forensic science meets the scientific standards currently required for adoption of a medical test or device. Given a multitude of stakeholders and, the charged and controversial nature and the potential societal impact of this technology, goodwill and collaboration of several government agencies may be required to sponsor impartial and comprehensive clinical trials that will guide the development of forensic fMRI technology.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23772173      PMCID: PMC3680134          DOI: 10.1037/a0028841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Public Policy Law        ISSN: 1076-8971


  50 in total

1.  Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation.

Authors:  G Ganis; S M Kosslyn; S Stose; W L Thompson; D A Yurgelun-Todd
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: where are we now? An appraisal of Wolpe, Foster and Langleben's "Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promise and perils" five years later.

Authors:  Steven E Hyman
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Andrew Kozel; Kevin A Johnson; Qiwen Mu; Emily L Grenesko; Steven J Laken; Mark S George
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Daniel D Langleben; James W Loughead; Warren B Bilker; Kosha Ruparel; Anna Rose Childress; Samantha I Busch; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.

Authors:  K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; D A Chesler; I E Goldberg; R M Weisskoff; B P Poncelet; D N Kennedy; B E Hoppel; M S Cohen; R Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promises and perils.

Authors:  Paul Root Wolpe; Kenneth R Foster; Daniel D Langleben
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 7.  Developing a neuropsychiatric functional brain imaging test.

Authors:  F Andrew Kozel; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.881

8.  The functional anatomical distinction between truth telling and deception is preserved among people with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Catherine J Kaylor-Hughes; Sudheer T Lankappa; Robert Fung; Alexandra E Hope-Urwin; Iain D Wilkinson; Sean A Spence
Journal:  Crim Behav Ment Health       Date:  2011-02

9.  'Munchausen's syndrome by proxy' or a 'miscarriage of justice'? An initial application of functional neuroimaging to the question of guilt versus innocence.

Authors:  Sean A Spence; Catherine J Kaylor-Hughes; Martin L Brook; Sudheer T Lankappa; Iain D Wilkinson
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 5.361

10.  Psychopathic traits and deception: functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Rachael S Fullam; Shane McKie; Mairead C Dolan
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.319

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Applications of neuroscience in criminal law: legal and methodological issues.

Authors:  John B Meixner
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Functional MRI-based lie detection: scientific and societal challenges.

Authors:  Martha J Farah; J Benjamin Hutchinson; Elizabeth A Phelps; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Cognitive neuroscience of honesty and deception: A signaling framework.

Authors:  Adrianna Jenkins; Lusha Zhu; Ming Hsu
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-10

4.  Detecting simulated versus bona fide traumatic brain injury using pupillometry.

Authors:  Sarah D Patrick; Lisa J Rapport; Robert J Kanser; Robin A Hanks; Jesse R Bashem
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.424

Review 5.  The role of expectations, hype and ethics in neuroimaging and neuromodulation futures.

Authors:  Elena Rusconi; Timothy Mitchener-Nissen
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-31

6.  A neural network approach to fMRI binocular visual rivalry task analysis.

Authors:  Nicola Bertolino; Stefania Ferraro; Anna Nigri; Maria Grazia Bruzzone; Francesco Ghielmetti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Integrating Brain Science and Law: Neuroscientific Evidence and Legal Perspectives on Protecting Individual Liberties.

Authors:  Calvin J Kraft; James Giordano
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  An instrument for visual cue associated craving of HEroin (IV-CACHE): A preliminary functional neuroimaging-based study of validity and reliability.

Authors:  Shantanu Shukla; Abhishek Ghosh; Chirag Kamal Ahuja; Debasish Basu; Bharath Holla
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 1.759

Review 9.  Prospects of functional magnetic resonance imaging as lie detector.

Authors:  Elena Rusconi; Timothy Mitchener-Nissen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Separating the Wheat From the Chaff: Guidance From New Technologies for Detecting Deception in the Courtroom.

Authors:  Judee K Burgoon
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 4.157

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.