Literature DB >> 1603645

A generalized visual latency explanation of the Pulfrich phenomenon.

P L Emerson1, B J Pesta.   

Abstract

The classical visual latency explanation of the Pulfrich phenomenon is generalized to allow for the possibility that the visual system uses velocity information from motion detectors to compensate for spatial lag due to time lag, in identifying the instantaneous position of a moving object. The results of the reported experiment verify one consequence of the generalized version: the elliptical apparent path is skewed away from the filtered eye. The results suggest also that the extrapolation factor increases with visual latency and that there is a different extrapolation factor for each eye when the eyes are illuminated unequally.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1603645     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  11 in total

1.  Theory of the Pulfrich effect.

Authors:  R A WEALE
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1954-12       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  The magnitude of the Pulfrich stereophenomenon as a function of binocular differences of intensity at various levels of illumination.

Authors:  A LIT
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1949-04

3.  The magnitude of the Pulfrich stereophenomenon as a function of distance of observation.

Authors:  A LIT; A HYMAN
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1951-11

4.  The perception of target motion during smooth pursuit eye movements in the open-loop condition: characteristics of retinal and extraretinal signals.

Authors:  J Pola; H J Wyatt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  On the apparent orbit of the Pulfrich pendulum.

Authors:  W R Levick; B G Cleland; J S Coombs
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion.

Authors:  O J Braddick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1980-07-08       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly. Part I. A quantitative analysis.

Authors:  W Reichardt; T Poggio
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.318

8.  The detection of motion in the peripheral visual field.

Authors:  S P McKee; K Nakayama
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Eccentricity-dependent scaling of the limits for short-range apparent motion perception.

Authors:  C L Baker; O J Braddick
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Dynamic visual noise and the stereophenomenon: interocular time delays, depth, and coherent velocities.

Authors:  D S Falk; R Williams
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The magnitude of monocular light attenuation required to elicit the Pulfrich illusion.

Authors:  C Vijay Reena Durai; Siddhart Rajendran; Michael A Webster; Sandeep Vempati; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 1.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.