Literature DB >> 6695503

The detection of motion in the peripheral visual field.

S P McKee, K Nakayama.   

Abstract

To assess the sensitivity of the periphery to motion, we measured differential motion detection and velocity discrimination as a function of eccentricity in the lower visual field. The differential motion threshold, a measure of the ability to detect relative motion (shear) between adjacent visual stimuli, is smaller than the minimum angle of resolution at all retinal loci tested. The target size required to produce the lowest differential motion threshold is surprisingly large, ranging from 1 deg in the fovea to about 20 deg at 40 degrees eccentricity. When the peripheral thresholds for differential motion and for resolution are normalized against the fovea and plotted on linear axes, the eccentricity functions are linear. Velocity discrimination (delta V/V) is as precise in the periphery as it is in the fovea, amounting to about 6% for the optimum velocity range. In the fovea, the minimum Weber fraction is reached at velocities of 5 deg/sec or faster. In the periphery this minimum is found for a faster range of velocities (greater than 30 deg/sec at 40 degrees eccentricity). If target velocity is expressed in the resolution units/second appropriate to each tested eccentricity, the velocity discrimination functions coincide. Thus, while the spatial determinants of velocity discrimination follow the change in resolution found with eccentricity, peripheral temporal sensitivity must be nearly equal to foveal temporal sensitivity.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6695503     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90140-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  51 in total

1.  Speed of visual processing increases with eccentricity.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Brian McElree; Kristina Denisova; Anna Marie Giordano
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Eye movements influence estimation of time-to-contact in prediction motion.

Authors:  Simon J Bennett; Robin Baures; Heiko Hecht; Nicolas Benguigui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A foveal target increases catch-up saccade frequency during smooth pursuit.

Authors:  Stephen J Heinen; Elena Potapchuk; Scott N J Watamaniuk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Visually controlled matching of pattern movement.

Authors:  R Wüst; A M Kappers; J J Koenderink
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-06

5.  Perceived motion direction during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Jan L Souman; Ignace Th C Hooge; Alexander H Wertheim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion.

Authors:  W H Warren; K J Kurtz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-05

7.  A generalized visual latency explanation of the Pulfrich phenomenon.

Authors:  P L Emerson; B J Pesta
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-04

8.  Detection of speed changes during pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Thomas Haarmeier; Peter Thier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Frame of reference transformations in motion perception during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Jan L Souman; Ignace Th C Hooge; Alexander H Wertheim
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 1.621

10.  Motion parallax from microscopic head movements during visual fixation.

Authors:  Murat Aytekin; Michele Rucci
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.