Literature DB >> 16036187

Trocar-associated injuries and fatalities: an analysis of 1399 reports to the FDA.

Janie Fuller1, Binita S Ashar, Julia Carey-Corrado.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic trocars, medical devices used to gain access into the abdominal cavity, are the most common device named in malpractice injury claims associated with laparoscopic procedures. As part of its ongoing adverse event reporting program, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires manufacturers and user facilities to file a report whenever a device was or may have been a factor in a death or serious injury. The FDA collects data from these reports in its Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. This study presents an analysis of fatality and injury data on laparoscopic trocars found in MAUDE reports received from January 1, 1997, through June 30, 2002, including 31 fatal injury cases and 1353 reports on nonfatal injuries. Cholecystectomy was the procedure most frequently associated with both fatal and nonfatal trocar injuries. Most fatalities involved vascular injuries. All fatality reports that identified the trocar design involved either a shielded trocar (which has a retractable shield that covers the trocar blade before and after insertion to help protect abdominal and pelvic organs from inadvertent puncture) or an optical trocar (which allows laparoscopists to view the cutting tip as it penetrates the tissues). Narrative comments cited surgical technique, device problems, and patient characteristics as contributing factors. Among nonfatal injuries, a change in surgical management such as additional surgical procedure--primarily laparotomy--prolonged surgery, or aborted surgery was reported most frequently for vascular and hollow viscus injuries. Many reports did not identify the device model, surgical procedure, or event timing, limiting Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and manufacturer investigations into whether the device contributed to the event. The most common manufacturer conclusions indicated the trocar was not returned, and no conclusions could be drawn about the trocar's contribution to the event. Fatalities occur with procedures in which shielded trocars and optical trocars are used. Further study is needed to evaluate the high proportion of reports associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopists should retain for evaluation any devices implicated in patient injuries and should ensure that detailed information on adverse events is provided in adverse event reports to the FDA. The FDA's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database can be a valuable source for information on adverse outcomes associated with medical devices and, given an understanding of its limitation, provides researchers with a viable adjunct to published literature and litigation surveys for obtaining this information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16036187     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  31 in total

1.  SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  D Wayne Overby; Keith N Apelgren; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  [Complicated course of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy].

Authors:  H Dralle; J Neu; F Köckerling; F Klee; M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Medical liability insurance claims on entry-related complications in laparoscopy.

Authors:  Jan Wind; Jan E L Cremers; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Dirk J Gouma; Frank-Willem Jansen; Willem A Bemelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Minimally Invasive Reoperation following Laparotomy.

Authors:  Tracey D Arnell
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-11

5.  Designing safety into the minimally invasive surgical revolution: a commentary based on the Jacques Perissat Lecture of the International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  John R Clarke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Magnetic surgery: first U.S. experience with a novel device.

Authors:  Ivy N Haskins; Andrew T Strong; Matthew T Allemang; Kalman P Bencsath; John H Rodriguez; Matthew D Kroh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Effect of laparoscopic abdominal surgery on splanchnic circulation: historical developments.

Authors:  Sinan Hatipoglu; Sami Akbulut; Filiz Hatipoglu; Ruslan Abdullayev
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Blunt versus bladed trocars in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; George A Antoniou; Oliver O Koch; Rudolph Pointner; Frank A Granderath
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Primary access-related complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy via the closed technique: experience of a single surgical team over more than 15 years.

Authors:  Prakash Kumar Sasmal; Om Tantia; Mayank Jain; Shashi Khanna; Bimalendu Sen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Review of adverse events associated with false glucose readings measured by GDH-PQQ-based glucose test strips in the presence of interfering sugars.

Authors:  Juan P Frias; Christine G Lim; John M Ellison; Carol M Montandon
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 17.152

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.