Literature DB >> 16034543

Kugel herniorrhaphy: clinical results of 124 consecutive operations.

Takeyuki Misawa1, Minori Sakurai, Hideki Kanai, Masato Matsushima, Yoji Yamazaki, Katsuhiko Yanaga.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Due to its recent clinical application, the results of Kugel herniorrhaphy have not yet been well documented. We analyzed our experience in performing 124 consecutive Kugel herniorrhaphies at a single institute.
METHODS: Since the first introduction of Kugel herniorrhaphy in Japan in September 2001, a total of 117 patients (124 hernias) have undergone this procedure at our institute. The operative technique of Kugel herniorrhaphy was directly obtained through two hands-on training courses that were given by Dr. Kugel. The clinical results of the 124 hernias were analyzed, and to understand the feasibility of performing Kugel herniorrhaphy for various types of hernias, the operation time and the necessity for dividing the hernia sac were compared among each type based on the Nyhus classification.
RESULTS: The operation times in types 2, 3A, 3B, 3C, and 4 were 48.5 +/- 19.5, 45.9 +/- 19.9, 54.2 +/- 24.8, 52.5 +/- 10.6, and 64.4 +/- 56.7 min, respectively, and the differences between each group were not statistically significant. In type 3A, no patient required a division of the hernia sac (0%), in contrast to 43% in type 3B. Peritoneal injury during operation and local hematoma/seroma were the most common complications (8.1% and 8.9%, respectively). Postoperatively the patients' quality of life factors, such as the analgesics needed, number of days before a return to normal activity, number of days before a return to work, and the recurrence rate of 0.9%, were comparable with other tension-free herniorrhaphy findings reported in the past.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that Kugel herniorrhaphy is equally feasible for all types of Nyhus classifications, including femoral and recurrent hernias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16034543     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-005-3012-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  17 in total

1.  AN OPERATION FOR THE RADICAL CURE OF INGUINAL AND FEMORAL HERNIA.

Authors:  G L Cheatle
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1920-07-17

2.  Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  J D Corbitt
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-03

3.  Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  R D Kugel
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Individualization of hernia repair: a new era.

Authors:  L M Nyhus
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  The diagnosis of femoral hernia.

Authors:  A P Corder
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Surgical outcome and cost-minimisation-analyses of laparoscopic and open hernia repair: a randomised prospective trial with one year follow up.

Authors:  A Kald; B Anderberg; P Carlsson; P O Park; K Smedh
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1997-07

7.  A prospective, randomized study of open vs laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. An assessment of postoperative pain.

Authors:  R Kozol; P M Lange; M Kosir; K Beleski; K Mason; S Tennenberg; S M Kubinec; R F Wilson
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-03

8.  The management of certain abdominal herniae by intra-abdominal closure of the neck of the sac. Preliminary communication.

Authors:  R Ger
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 9.  Entrapment neuropathy in laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  A S Seid; E Amos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia using a preperitoneal approach: a preliminary report.

Authors:  M E Arregui; C J Davis; O Yucel; R F Nagan
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1992-03
View more
  8 in total

1.  Open, preperitoneal hernia repair with the Kugel patch: a prospective, multicentre study of 450 repairs.

Authors:  Y Van Nieuwenhove; F Vansteenkiste; T Vierendeels; K Coenye
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Comparison of the posterior approach and anterior approach for a Kugel repair of treatment of inguinal hernias.

Authors:  Xuelu Zhou
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Systemic inflammatory response after Kugel versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Omer Bender; Fatih Levent Balcı; Enis Yüney; Fazıl Sağlam; Yaşar Ozdenkaya; Yavuz Selim Sarı
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Chronic pain after Kugel inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  R Hompes; F Vansteenkiste; H Pottel; D Devriendt; F Van Rooy
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Early experience of performing a modified Kugel hernia repair with local anesthesia.

Authors:  Junsheng Li; Yanan Zhang; Haolin Hu; Whenhao Tang
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Modified Kugel herniorrhaphy using standardized dissection technique of the preperitoneal space: long-term operative outcome in consecutive 340 patients with inguinal hernia.

Authors:  K Suwa; S Nakajima; K Hanyu; T Suzuki; T Okamoto; K Yanaga
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Pain after open preperitoneal repair versus Lichtenstein repair: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Simon Nienhuijs; Erik Staal; Mariël Keemers-Gels; Camiel Rosman; Luc Strobbe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Colovesical fistula following an open preperitoneal "Kugel" mesh repair of an inguinal hernia.

Authors:  S G Barreto; D Schoemaker; M Siddins; D Wattchow
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.739

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.