Literature DB >> 19440788

Systemic inflammatory response after Kugel versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: a prospective randomized trial.

Omer Bender1, Fatih Levent Balcı, Enis Yüney, Fazıl Sağlam, Yaşar Ozdenkaya, Yavuz Selim Sarı.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Kugel repair, a minimally invasive technique, has become an alternative to laparoscopic groin hernia repair, but the technique has not been adequately evaluated by assessment of objective parameters. A prospective randomized clinical study was carried out to compare the systemic inflammatory response to surgical trauma and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent groin hernia repair by the Kugel and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic methods.
METHODS: Forty consecutive patients admitted for unilateral groin hernia were randomized to Kugel (n = 20) or TEP (n = 20) repair under general anesthesia. Operation time, length of hospital stay, pain severity, time to return to normal activities, cost, and systemic inflammatory and hormone responses to surgical trauma were compared.
RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in duration of operation, length of hospital stay, time to return to normal activities, or mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score (p > 0.05 for each). Serum cortisol, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and interleukin (IL)-6 concentrations before surgery, and 1 and 24 h after surgery, did not differ significantly in the two groups (p > 0.05). There were no recurrences or complications during follow-up. Cost per patient was US $546 lower in the Kugel group.
CONCLUSION: Kugel herniorrhaphy is a minimally invasive technique that offers all the advantages of TEP and is more cost-effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19440788     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0495-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  24 in total

1.  Kugel hernia repair: open "mini-invasive" technique. Personal experience on 620 patients.

Authors:  V Ceriani; E Faleschini; P Bignami; T Lodi; O Roncaglia; C Osio; D Sarli
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  R D Kugel
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Magnus Hallén; Anders Bergenfelz; Johan Westerdahl
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Salivary cortisol on ROCHE Elecsys immunoassay system: pilot biological variation studies.

Authors:  Simon K Chiu; Christine P Collier; Albert F Clark; Katherine E Wynn-Edwards
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.281

5.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group.

Authors:  A E Ortega; J G Hunter; J H Peters; L L Swanstrom; B Schirmer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  A cost and outcome comparison between laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernia operations in a day-case unit. A randomized prospective study.

Authors:  T J Heikkinen; K Haukipuro; A Hulkko
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Comparison of Kugel and Lichtenstein operations for inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Osman Dogru; Mustafa Girgin; Nurullah Bulbuller; Ziya Cetinkaya; Erhan Aygen; Cemalettin Camci
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  The Kugel repair for groin hernias.

Authors:  Robert D Kugel
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  M A Memon; N J Cooper; B Memon; M I Memon; K R Abrams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Systemic inflammatory response after hernia repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dunja Kokotovic; Jakob Burcharth; Frederik Helgstrand; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Assessment of systemic inflammatory response after total extraperitoneal repair and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia.

Authors:  M Vats; D Pandey; S Saha; N Talwar; G Saurabh; M Andley; A Kumar
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Posterior mesh inguinal hernia repairs: a propensity score matched analysis of laparoscopic and robotic versus open approaches.

Authors:  M Reinhorn; N Fullington; D Agarwal; M A Olson; L Ott; A Canavan; B Pate; M Hubertus; A Urquiza; B Poulose; J Warren
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 2.920

Review 4.  A detailed analysis of outcome reporting from randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  A Bhangu; P Singh; T Pinkney; J M Blazeby
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus open Lichtenstein hernia repair. Comparison of the systemic inflammatory response and the postoperative pain1.

Authors:  Milton Rigoberto Fonseca Quispe; Wilson Salgado Júnior
Journal:  Acta Cir Bras       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 1.388

6.  28 day post-operative persisted hypercoagulability after surgery for benign diseases: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jan Ulrych; Tomas Kvasnicka; Vladimir Fryba; Martin Komarc; Ivana Malikova; Filip Burget; Radka Brzezkova; Jan Kvasnicka; Zdenek Krska; Jan Kvasnicka
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.