Jillian T Henderson1, Carol S Weisman. 1. Center for Reproductive Health Research and Policy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA. hendersonj@obgyn.ucsf.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Women have different patterns of provider use across the lifespan, but few studies have investigated women's evaluations of their primary care providers at different ages. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the relationship between patterns of regular provider use and women's satisfaction with primary care across the lifespan. RESEARCH DESIGN: A sample of 1197 women ages 18 to 87 making primary health care visits was surveyed. Satisfaction with primary care in the past year was measured with a subscale the Care Coordination and Comprehensiveness subscale of the Primary Care Satisfaction Survey for Women (PCSSW). Bivariate comparisons and age stratified multivariate ordinal logistic regression models were estimated. RESULTS: Women in their early reproductive years (ages 18 to 34) are more satisfied with care coordination and comprehensiveness when their regular provider is a reproductive health specialist, primarily obstetrician gynecologist (ob/gyn) physicians. The odds of higher satisfaction are reduced with a generalist regular provider (OR = 0.38, P < 0.01), a generalist regular provider plus an ob/gyn (OR = 0.47, P < 0.05), or no regular provider (OR = 0.52, P < 0.05). The pattern of regular provider use is not significantly associated with satisfaction for women in other age categories. CONCLUSIONS: Most adult women see generalists for their primary health care, either alone or in combination with ob/gyns. Among younger women satisfaction is higher when an ob/gyn is the regular provider. Further research must consider women's perspectives on their provider use patterns and the appropriate role of ob/gyns in women's primary care across the lifespan.
BACKGROUND:Women have different patterns of provider use across the lifespan, but few studies have investigated women's evaluations of their primary care providers at different ages. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the relationship between patterns of regular provider use and women's satisfaction with primary care across the lifespan. RESEARCH DESIGN: A sample of 1197 women ages 18 to 87 making primary health care visits was surveyed. Satisfaction with primary care in the past year was measured with a subscale the Care Coordination and Comprehensiveness subscale of the Primary Care Satisfaction Survey for Women (PCSSW). Bivariate comparisons and age stratified multivariate ordinal logistic regression models were estimated. RESULTS:Women in their early reproductive years (ages 18 to 34) are more satisfied with care coordination and comprehensiveness when their regular provider is a reproductive health specialist, primarily obstetrician gynecologist (ob/gyn) physicians. The odds of higher satisfaction are reduced with a generalist regular provider (OR = 0.38, P < 0.01), a generalist regular provider plus an ob/gyn (OR = 0.47, P < 0.05), or no regular provider (OR = 0.52, P < 0.05). The pattern of regular provider use is not significantly associated with satisfaction for women in other age categories. CONCLUSIONS: Most adult women see generalists for their primary health care, either alone or in combination with ob/gyns. Among younger women satisfaction is higher when an ob/gyn is the regular provider. Further research must consider women's perspectives on their provider use patterns and the appropriate role of ob/gyns in women's primary care across the lifespan.
Authors: Kelli Stidham Hall; Elizabeth W Patton; Halley P Crissman; Melissa K Zochowski; Vanessa K Dalton Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Lori A Bastian; Mark Trentalange; Terrence E Murphy; Cynthia Brandt; Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Natalya C Maisel; Steven M Wright; Vera S Gaetano; Heather Allore; Melissa Skanderson; Evelyn Reyes-Harvey; Elizabeth M Yano; Danielle Rose; Sally Haskell Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2014-10-28
Authors: Julie Schmittdiel; Joe V Selby; Bix Swain; Stacie L Daugherty; Thomas K Leong; Michael Ho; Karen L Margolis; Patrick O'Connor; David J Magid; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo Journal: Hypertension Date: 2011-02-21 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Colin Malone; Diana S M Buist; Jasmin Tiro; William Barlow; Hongyuan Gao; John Lin; Rachel L Winer Journal: Prev Med Date: 2020-12-31 Impact factor: 4.018