Literature DB >> 16027982

Reducing errors in the operating room: surgical proficiency and quality assurance of execution.

A Cuschieri1.   

Abstract

Technical operative errors cause surgical operative morbidity and adversely affect the clinical outcome of patients. Surgical proficiency thus underpins good and safe practice. In this context, standardization of endoscopic surgical operations and their execution are essential for the procurement and maintenance of quality assurance in endoscopic surgical practice. There is no clash between individual- (surgical proficiency) and system-based defense systems in the prevention of surgical errors--both underpin safe surgical practice. Although more human factors and surgical research are needed, it is possible to formulate and adopt a surgical error reduction system for endoscopic operations based on standardization of operations, surgical operative proficiency, and human reliability assessment and its related clinical counterpart, observational clinical human reliability assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16027982     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-8110-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

1.  Delayed recognition of inadvertent gut injury during laparoscopy.

Authors:  R Orlando; F Lirussi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective.

Authors:  Lawrence W Way; Lygia Stewart; Walter Gantert; Kingsway Liu; Crystine M Lee; Karen Whang; John G Hunter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Real-time thermography during energized vessel sealing and dissection.

Authors:  P A Campbell; A B Cresswell; T G Frank; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Medical errors, incidents, accidents and violations.

Authors: 
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.442

Review 5.  Recent advances in high-frequency electrosurgery: development of automated systems.

Authors:  R Haag; A Cuschieri
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1993-12

6.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey.

Authors:  S B Archer; D W Brown; C D Smith; G D Branum; J G Hunter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy-related bile duct injuries: a health and financial disaster.

Authors:  S J Savader; K D Lillemoe; C A Prescott; A B Winick; A C Venbrux; G B Lund; S E Mitchell; J L Cameron; F A Osterman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Management of main bile duct injuries that occur during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M Doganay; N A Kama; E Reis; M Kologlu; M Atli; U Gozalan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic bowel injuries: forty litigated gynaecological cases in Canada.

Authors:  George A Vilos
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2002-03

10.  Identification and categorization of technical errors by Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment (OCHRA) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  B Tang; G B Hanna; P Joice; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-11
View more
  10 in total

1.  Inconsistent reporting of minimally invasive surgery errors.

Authors:  A D White; M Skelton; F Mushtaq; T W Pike; M Mon-Williams; J P A Lodge; R M Wilkie
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Nature of human error: implications for surgical practice.

Authors:  Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Informed consent-'da Vinci code' for our safety in empowered patient's safety.

Authors:  Brij B Agarwal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Identification of technical errors and hazard zones in sleeve gastrectomy using OCHRA : "OCHRA for sleeve gastrectomy".

Authors:  Pwj van Rutte; S W Nienhuijs; J J Jakimowicz; G van Montfort
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Towards standardized robotic surgery in gastrointestinal oncology.

Authors:  Lawrence M Knab; Amer H Zureikat; Herbert J Zeh; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Feasibility of "cold" triangle robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Emanuele F Kauffmann; Niccolò Napoli; Michael Ginesini; Cesare Gianfaldoni; Fabio Asta; Alice Salamone; Gabriella Amorese; Fabio Vistoli; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  The surgical safety checklist survey: a national perspective on patient safety.

Authors:  E Nugent; H Hseino; K Ryan; O Traynor; P Neary; F B V Keane
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Application of objective clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) in assessment of technical performance in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  J D Foster; D Miskovic; A S Allison; J A Conti; J Ockrim; E J Cooper; G B Hanna; N K Francis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  "To Err Is Human…"-Managing Human Error in Reconstructive Microsurgery Training with Defense Barriers.

Authors:  Georgios Pafitanis; Ali Ghanem; Simon Myers
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-04-19

10.  Quality and safety of minimally invasive surgery: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Bernadette McCrory; Chad A LaGrange; Ms Hallbeck
Journal:  Biomed Eng Comput Biol       Date:  2014-04-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.