| Literature DB >> 10167344 |
Abstract
Most medical cost-effectiveness analyses include future costs only for related illnesses, but this approach is controversial. This paper demonstrates that cost-effectiveness analysis is consistent with lifetime utility maximization only if it includes all future medical and non-medical expenditures. Estimates of the magnitude of these future costs suggest that they may substantially alter both the absolute and relative cost-effectiveness of medical interventions, particularly when an intervention increases length of life more than quality of life. In older populations, current methods overstate the cost-effectiveness of interventions which extend life compared to interventions which improve the quality of life.Mesh:
Year: 1997 PMID: 10167344 DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6296(96)00507-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Econ ISSN: 0167-6296 Impact factor: 3.883