Literature DB >> 16023866

Spatiotemporal Bayesian inference dipole analysis for MEG neuroimaging data.

Sung C Jun1, John S George, Juliana Paré-Blagoev, Sergey M Plis, Doug M Ranken, David M Schmidt, C C Wood.   

Abstract

Recently, we described a Bayesian inference approach to the MEG/EEG inverse problem that used numerical techniques to estimate the full posterior probability distributions of likely solutions upon which all inferences were based [Schmidt, D.M., George, J.S., Wood, C.C., 1999. Bayesian inference applied to the electromagnetic inverse problem. Human Brain Mapping 7, 195; Schmidt, D.M., George, J.S., Ranken, D.M., Wood, C.C., 2001. Spatial-temporal bayesian inference for MEG/EEG. In: Nenonen, J., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Katila, T. (Eds.), Biomag 2000: 12th International Conference on Biomagnetism. Espoo, Norway, p. 671]. Schmidt et al. (1999) focused on the analysis of data at a single point in time employing an extended region source model. They subsequently extended their work to a spatiotemporal Bayesian inference analysis of the full spatiotemporal MEG/EEG data set. Here, we formulate spatiotemporal Bayesian inference analysis using a multi-dipole model of neural activity. This approach is faster than the extended region model, does not require use of the subject's anatomical information, does not require prior determination of the number of dipoles, and yields quantitative probabilistic inferences. In addition, we have incorporated the ability to handle much more complex and realistic estimates of the background noise, which may be represented as a sum of Kronecker products of temporal and spatial noise covariance components. This reduces the effects of undermodeling noise. In order to reduce the rigidity of the multi-dipole formulation which commonly causes problems due to multiple local minima, we treat the given covariance of the background as uncertain and marginalize over it in the analysis. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) was used to sample the many possible likely solutions. The spatiotemporal Bayesian dipole analysis is demonstrated using simulated and empirical whole-head MEG data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16023866     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  16 in total

1.  Bayesian inverse analysis of neuromagnetic data using cortically constrained multiple dipoles.

Authors:  Toni Auranen; Aapo Nummenmaa; Matti S Hämäläinen; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Jouko Lampinen; Aki Vehtari; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Automatic relevance determination based hierarchical Bayesian MEG inversion in practice.

Authors:  Aapo Nummenmaa; Toni Auranen; Matti S Hämäläinen; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Mikko Sams; Aki Vehtari; Jouko Lampinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Bayesian brain source imaging based on combined MEG/EEG and fMRI using MCMC.

Authors:  Sung C Jun; John S George; Woohan Kim; Juliana Paré-Blagoev; Sergey Plis; Doug M Ranken; David M Schmidt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Dynamical MEG source modeling with multi-target Bayesian filtering.

Authors:  Alberto Sorrentino; Lauri Parkkonen; Annalisa Pascarella; Cristina Campi; Michele Piana
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Localization of coherent sources by simultaneous MEG and EEG beamformer.

Authors:  Jun Hee Hong; Minkyu Ahn; Kiwoong Kim; Sung Chan Jun
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  EEG/MEG source reconstruction with spatial-temporal two-way regularized regression.

Authors:  Tian Siva Tian; Jianhua Z Huang; Haipeng Shen; Zhimin Li
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2013-10

7.  Automatic fMRI-guided MEG multidipole localization for visual responses.

Authors:  Toni Auranen; Aapo Nummenmaa; Simo Vanni; Aki Vehtari; Matti S Hämäläinen; Jouko Lampinen; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Probabilistic algorithms for MEG/EEG source reconstruction using temporal basis functions learned from data.

Authors:  Johanna M Zumer; Hagai T Attias; Kensuke Sekihara; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  A Subspace Pursuit-based Iterative Greedy Hierarchical solution to the neuromagnetic inverse problem.

Authors:  Behtash Babadi; Gabriel Obregon-Henao; Camilo Lamus; Matti S Hämäläinen; Emery N Brown; Patrick L Purdon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  MEG and fMRI Fusion for Non-Linear Estimation of Neural and BOLD Signal Changes.

Authors:  Sergey M Plis; Vince D Calhoun; Michael P Weisend; Tom Eichele; Terran Lane
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.