Literature DB >> 25411482

Area MT encodes three-dimensional motion.

Thaddeus B Czuba1, Alexander C Huk2, Lawrence K Cormack3, Adam Kohn4.   

Abstract

We use visual information to determine our dynamic relationship with other objects in a three-dimensional (3D) world. Despite decades of work on visual motion processing, it remains unclear how 3D directions-trajectories that include motion toward or away from the observer-are represented and processed in visual cortex. Area MT is heavily implicated in processing visual motion and depth, yet previous work has found little evidence for 3D direction sensitivity per se. Here we use a rich ensemble of binocular motion stimuli to reveal that most neurons in area MT of the anesthetized macaque encode 3D motion information. This tuning for 3D motion arises from multiple mechanisms, including different motion preferences in the two eyes and a nonlinear interaction of these signals when both eyes are stimulated. Using a novel method for functional binocular alignment, we were able to rule out contributions of static disparity tuning to the 3D motion tuning we observed. We propose that a primary function of MT is to encode 3D motion, critical for judging the movement of objects in dynamic real-world environments.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/3415522-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D motion; IOVD; area MT; binocular vision; motion-in-depth; stereomotion

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25411482      PMCID: PMC4236390          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1081-14.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  60 in total

1.  Speed and eccentricity tuning reveal a central role for the velocity-based cue to 3D visual motion.

Authors:  Thaddeus B Czuba; Bas Rokers; Alexander C Huk; Lawrence K Cormack
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A cortical region consisting entirely of face-selective cells.

Authors:  Doris Y Tsao; Winrich A Freiwald; Roger B H Tootell; Margaret S Livingstone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Comparison of recordings from microelectrode arrays and single electrodes in the visual cortex.

Authors:  Ryan C Kelly; Matthew A Smith; Jason M Samonds; Adam Kohn; A B Bonds; J Anthony Movshon; Tai Sing Lee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Binocular vision and motion-in-depth.

Authors:  Julie M Harris; Harold T Nefs; Catherine E Grafton
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2008

5.  Integration of monocular motion signals and the analysis of interocular velocity differences for the perception of motion-in-depth.

Authors:  Satoshi Shioiri; Daisuke Kakehi; Tomoyoshi Tashiro; Hirohisa Yaguchi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Disparity- and velocity-based signals for three-dimensional motion perception in human MT+.

Authors:  Bas Rokers; Lawrence K Cormack; Alexander C Huk
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Motion processing with two eyes in three dimensions.

Authors:  Bas Rokers; Thaddeus B Czuba; Lawrence K Cormack; Alexander C Huk
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Spatial and temporal scales of neuronal correlation in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Matthew A Smith; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Stereomotion processing in the human occipital cortex.

Authors:  Lora T Likova; Christopher W Tyler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Sensitivity of human visual cortical area V6 to stereoscopic depth gradients associated with self-motion.

Authors:  Velia Cardin; Andrew T Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  30 in total

1.  Neural representation of motion-in-depth in area MT.

Authors:  Takahisa M Sanada; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Responses in area hMT+ reflect tuning for both auditory frequency and motion after blindness early in life.

Authors:  Elizabeth Huber; Fang Jiang; Ione Fine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Interocular velocity cues elicit vergence eye movements in mice.

Authors:  Veronica Choi; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Separate Perceptual and Neural Processing of Velocity- and Disparity-Based 3D Motion Signals.

Authors:  Sung Jun Joo; Thaddeus B Czuba; Lawrence K Cormack; Alexander C Huk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Contributions of binocular and monocular cues to motion-in-depth perception.

Authors:  Lowell Thompson; Mohan Ji; Bas Rokers; Ari Rosenberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  A Neural Model of MST and MT Explains Perceived Object Motion during Self-Motion.

Authors:  Oliver W Layton; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  A Model of Binocular Motion Integration in MT Neurons.

Authors:  Pamela M Baker; Wyeth Bair
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Binocular Mechanisms of 3D Motion Processing.

Authors:  Lawrence K Cormack; Thaddeus B Czuba; Jonas Knöll; Alexander C Huk
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 6.422

Review 9.  Neurophysiological considerations for visual implants.

Authors:  Sabrina J Meikle; Yan T Wong
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 3.270

10.  Disparity Sensitivity and Binocular Integration in Mouse Visual Cortex Areas.

Authors:  Alessandro La Chioma; Tobias Bonhoeffer; Mark Hübener
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.