Literature DB >> 16023065

A prospective randomized clinical trial of laser in situ keratomileusis with two different lasers.

Michael D Twa1, Richard G Lembach, Mark A Bullimore, Cynthia Roberts.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare optical quality, visual function, corneal shape, ocular wavefront aberrations, and patient-reported symptoms and satisfaction after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with two different excimer lasers.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial.
METHODS: In an institutional practice setting, 60 eyes of 30 patients with low to moderate myopia were randomized to receive LASIK in one eye with the Technolas 217A; the other eye was treated with the VISX S3. Patients were followed for 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome measure was best spectacle-corrected visual acuity.
RESULTS: At 6 months, the mean best-spectacle corrected high contrast visual acuity was similar between the two treatment groups: mean difference (95% confidence interval) was -0.01 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) (-0.03 to +0.01 logMAR). Uncorrected visual acuity differences were also not significant. The difference in residual spherical equivalent subjective refractive error between treatment groups was -0.15 diopter (-0.34 to +0.05 diopter). Spherical aberration increased in both groups after treatment, and the change in root mean square (RMS) ocular wavefront error was greater in the VISX group by +0.07 microm (+0.03 to +0.11 microm). After LASIK, corneal curvature was steeper in the midperipheral region among VISX-treated eyes by +1.39 diopters (+2.06 to +0.72 diopters). There were no patient-reported differences in satisfaction between eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in visual acuity or refractive outcomes attributed to either laser under any of the conditions measured. There was also no significant difference in patient-reported symptoms, satisfaction with treatment, or eye preference associated with either laser. Additional study is needed to establish the importance of differences in higher-order optical aberrations and corneal shape that we observed in these two treatment groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16023065     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  3 in total

1.  Visual and non-visual factors associated with patient satisfaction and quality of life in LASIK.

Authors:  P Lazon de la Jara; D Erickson; P Erickson; F Stapleton
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Anatomical and Visual Outcomes after LASIK Performed in Myopic Eyes with the WaveLight® Refractive Suite (Alcon® Laboratories Inc., USA).

Authors:  Imene Salah-Mabed; Sarah Moran; Emmanuelle Perez; Guillaume Debellemanière; Damien Gatinel
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Myopic Laser-Assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy (LASEK) outcomes using three different excimer laser platforms: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Isabel Rodríguez-Pérez; Juan Gros-Otero; Miguel A Teus; Rafael Cañones; Montserrat García-González
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.209

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.