Literature DB >> 16022307

Farming practices influence wild pollinator populations on squash and pumpkin.

Rachel E Shuler1, Tai H Roulston, Grace E Farris.   

Abstract

Recent declines in managed honey bee, Apis mellifera L., colonies have increased interest in the current and potential contribution of wild bee populations to the pollination of agricultural crops. Because wild bees often live in agricultural fields, their population density and contribution to crop pollination may be influenced by farming practices, especially those used to reduce the populations of other insects. We took a census of pollinators of squash and pumpkin at 25 farms in Virginia, West Virginia, and Maryland to see whether pollinator abundance was related to farming practices. The main pollinators were Peponapis pruinosa Say; honey bees, and bumble bees (Bombus spp.). The squash bee was the most abundant pollinator on squash and pumpkin, occurring at 23 of 25 farms in population densities that were commonly several times higher than that of other pollinators. Squash bee density was related to tillage practices: no-tillage farms hosted three times as great a density of squash bees as tilled farms. Pollinator density was not related to pesticide use. Honey bee density on squash and pumpkin was not related to the presence of managed honey bee colonies on farms. Farms with colonies did not have more honey bees per flower than farms that did not keep honey bees, probably reflecting the lack of affinity of honey bees for these crops. Future research should examine the economic impacts of managing farms in ways that promote pollinators, particularly pollinators of crops that are not well served by managed honey bee colonies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16022307     DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-98.3.790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  21 in total

1.  Wild bees enhance honey bees' pollination of hybrid sunflower.

Authors:  Sarah S Greenleaf; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity.

Authors:  Tim Newbold; Lawrence N Hudson; Samantha L L Hill; Sara Contu; Igor Lysenko; Rebecca A Senior; Luca Börger; Dominic J Bennett; Argyrios Choimes; Ben Collen; Julie Day; Adriana De Palma; Sandra Díaz; Susy Echeverria-Londoño; Melanie J Edgar; Anat Feldman; Morgan Garon; Michelle L K Harrison; Tamera Alhusseini; Daniel J Ingram; Yuval Itescu; Jens Kattge; Victoria Kemp; Lucinda Kirkpatrick; Michael Kleyer; David Laginha Pinto Correia; Callum D Martin; Shai Meiri; Maria Novosolov; Yuan Pan; Helen R P Phillips; Drew W Purves; Alexandra Robinson; Jake Simpson; Sean L Tuck; Evan Weiher; Hannah J White; Robert M Ewers; Georgina M Mace; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Modeling the status, trends, and impacts of wild bee abundance in the United States.

Authors:  Insu Koh; Eric V Lonsdorf; Neal M Williams; Claire Brittain; Rufus Isaacs; Jason Gibbs; Taylor H Ricketts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops.

Authors:  Alexandra-Maria Klein; Bernard E Vaissière; James H Cane; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Saul A Cunningham; Claire Kremen; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield.

Authors:  Patrick Hoehn; Teja Tscharntke; Jason M Tylianakis; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Crop domestication facilitated rapid geographical expansion of a specialist pollinator, the squash bee Peponapis pruinosa.

Authors:  Margarita M López-Uribe; James H Cane; Robert L Minckley; Bryan N Danforth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Crop production in the USA is frequently limited by a lack of pollinators.

Authors:  J R Reilly; D R Artz; D Biddinger; K Bobiwash; N K Boyle; C Brittain; J Brokaw; J W Campbell; J Daniels; E Elle; J D Ellis; S J Fleischer; J Gibbs; R L Gillespie; K B Gundersen; L Gut; G Hoffman; N Joshi; O Lundin; K Mason; C M McGrady; S S Peterson; T L Pitts-Singer; S Rao; N Rothwell; L Rowe; K L Ward; N M Williams; J K Wilson; R Isaacs; R Winfree
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Movement of soil-applied imidacloprid and thiamethoxam into nectar and pollen of squash (Cucurbita pepo).

Authors:  Kimberly A Stoner; Brian D Eitzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter-rows in different floral kingdoms.

Authors:  Sophie Kratschmer; Bärbel Pachinger; René Gaigher; James S Pryke; Julia van Schalkwyk; Michael J Samways; Annalie Melin; Temitope Kehinde; Johann G Zaller; Silvia Winter
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Pollinator and herbivore attraction to cucurbita floral volatiles.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Andrews; Nina Theis; Lynn S Adler
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 2.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.