Literature DB >> 16021453

Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing using oral and rectal stool softeners (fecal cracking)--a feasibility study.

Waleed Ajaj1, Thomas C Lauenstein, Hubert Schneemann, Christiane Kuehle, Christoph U Herborn, Susanne C Goehde, Stefan G Ruehm, Mathias Goyen.   

Abstract

The aim of our study was to assess the effect of oral and rectal stool softeners on dark-lumen magnetic resonance (MR) colonography without bowel cleansing. Ten volunteers underwent MR colonography without colonic cleansing. A baseline examination was performed without oral or rectal administration of stool softeners. In a second set, volunteers ingested 60 ml of lactulose 24 h prior to MR examination. In a third examination, water as a rectal enema was replaced by a solution of 0.5%-docusate sodium (DS). A fourth MR examination was performed, in conjunction with both oral administration of lactulose and rectal application of DS. A T1-weighted data set was acquired at scanning times of 0, 5 and 10 min after colonic filling. A fourth data set was acquired 75 s after i.v. injection of contrast agent. Signal intensity of stool was calculated for all colonic segments. Without oral ingestion of lactulose or rectal enema with DS stool signal intensity was high and did not decrease over time. However, lactulose and DS caused a decrease in stool signal intensity. Both substances together led to a decreasing signal intensity of feces. Combination of lactulose and DS provided the lowest signal intensity of stool. Thus, feces could hardly be distinguished from dark rectal enema allowing for the assessment of the colonic wall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16021453     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2838-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  27 in total

Review 1.  Screening for colorectal cancer in Germany: guidelines and reality.

Authors:  H Neuhaus
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Bowel MR imaging with oral Gastrografin: an experimental study with healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A S Borthne; J B Dormagen; K I Gjesdal; T Storaas; I Lygren; J T Geitung
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-07-02       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  3D MR colonography after intravenous administration of the hepatobiliary contrast agent Gd-BOPTA: bile tagging.

Authors:  Michael V Knopp; Fredrik Giesel; Hendrick von Tengg-Kobligk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Colonic lavage: flavoring and the importance of patients' compliance.

Authors:  F Froehlich; M Fried; J J Gonvers
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Effect of dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate on colonic fluid and electrolyte movement.

Authors:  M Donowitz; H J Binder
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance.

Authors:  T Lauenstein; G Holtmann; D Schoenfelder; S Bosk; S G Ruehm; J F Debatin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Cost-effective treatment of constipation in the elderly: a randomized double-blind comparison of sorbitol and lactulose.

Authors:  F A Lederle; D L Busch; K M Mattox; M J West; D M Aske
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Cancer statistics, 1998.

Authors:  S H Landis; T Murray; S Bolden; P A Wingo
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  The effect of lactulose and lactitol administration on fecal fat excretion in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  M Merli; M Caschera; C Piat; G Pinto; M Diofebi; O Riggio
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  Effect of oral dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate on intake-output studies of human small and large intestine.

Authors:  R W Chapman; J Sillery; D D Fontana; C Matthys; D R Saunders
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  5 in total

1.  Utility of dark-lumen MR colonography for the assessment of extra-colonic organs.

Authors:  Waleed Ajaj; Stefan G Ruehm; Susanne C Ladd; Guido Gerken; Mathias Goyen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  MR colonography: current status.

Authors:  Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  MR colonography vs. optical colonoscopy: comparison of patients' acceptance in a screening population.

Authors:  Sonja Kinner; Christiane A Kuehle; Jost Langhorst; Susanne C Ladd; Michael Nuefer; Thomas Zoepf; Joerg Barkhausen; Guido Gerken; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies.

Authors:  Frank M Zijta; Shandra Bipat; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Dark-lumen MR colonography with fecal tagging: a comparison of water enema and air methods of colonic distension for detecting colonic neoplasms.

Authors:  Sonia Rodriguez Gomez; Mario Pagés Llinas; Antoni Castells Garangou; Carmen De Juan Garcia; Josep M Bordas Alsina; Jordi Rimola Gibert; Juan R Ayuso Colella; Carmen Ayuso Colella
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 7.034

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.