Literature DB >> 16021075

Mode of delivery and problems in subsequent births: a register-based study from Finland.

Elina Hemminki1, Julia Shelley, Mika Gissler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of delivery on problems in subsequent births. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a cohort study that used register data for 73,104 mothers who had their first birth from 1987 to 1989 and subsequent births from 1987 to1998. Three analyses were performed: (1) examination of second births by mode of delivery in the first birth, with adjustment for confounders, (2) same parameter, with exclusion of women with persistent problems, and (3) examination of third births for women with a first birth vaginal delivery.
RESULTS: More complications and poorer infant outcome were found at later births when the first or second birth was by cesarean delivery than after a first spontaneous vaginal delivery, even when women with persistent problems were excluded. Women with instrument first births had a similar rate of complications in the second birth to women with spontaneous vaginal births, but some infant outcomes were poorer.
CONCLUSION: Problems that are subsequent to cesarean delivery are unlikely to be explained entirely by indications for cesarean delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16021075     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

1.  Is planned cesarean childbirth a safe alternative?

Authors:  B Anthony Armson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Patient-choice vaginal delivery?

Authors:  Lawrence M Leeman; Lauren A Plante
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Neonatal outcomes associated with mode of subsequent birth after a previous caesarean section in a first pregnancy: a Swedish population-based register study between 1999 and 2015.

Authors:  Anna Dencker; Ida Lyckestam Thelin; Valerie Smith; Ingela Lundgren; Christina Nilsson; Huiqi Li; Lars Ladfors; Anders Elfvin
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2022-07

4.  Mode of first delivery and women's intentions for subsequent childbearing: findings from the First Baby Study.

Authors:  Kristen H Kjerulff; Diana L Velott; Junjia Zhu; Cynthia H Chuang; Marianne M Hillemeier; Ian M Paul; John T Repke
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.980

5.  Mode of delivery and subsequent fertility.

Authors:  E C Evers; K C McDermott; J L Blomquist; V L Handa
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Louise Fischer Christensen; Charlotte Overgaard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oonagh E Keag; Jane E Norman; Sarah J Stock
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  First birth Caesarean section and subsequent fertility: a population-based study in the USA, 2000-2008.

Authors:  K H Kjerulff; J Zhu; C S Weisman; C V Ananth
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Cesarean deliveries and maternal weight retention.

Authors:  Kandice A Kapinos; Olga Yakusheva; Marianne Weiss
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Does caesarean delivery in the first pregnancy increase the risk for adverse outcome in the second? A registry-based cohort study on first and second singleton births in Norway.

Authors:  Solveig Bjellmo; Guro L Andersen; Sissel Hjelle; Kari Klungsøyr; Lone Krebs; Stian Lydersen; Pål Richard Romundstad; Torstein Vik
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.